The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it ethical to turn potentionally gay babies straight?
I predict the future will be much like an episode of the Outer Limits
Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks - those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest. - Thus spoke Zarathustra, Fredrick Nietzsche
Originally posted by The Mad Monk
If you can abort them for any reason, it follows that you can "adjust" them as well.
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
why are you posting here? You're spreading like a disease.
Great way to welcome newbies
I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
In India lots of parents have their female children aborted already, as opposed to male children that are welcomed. It evidently creates a completely distorted society with an overabundance of men, in some rural areas complete villages are nearly devoid of women!
I'm not saying it's ethically right, but in this situation it might be ethically better to alter the gender, even if it has the same results as traditional abortions would have.
Besides that it'd be interesting to research, but foolish to implement. Nature provides us with close to 50/50 men/women; let's -for practical reasons- not mess with that.
"An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
"Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
With this issue, I guess I see a problem with using eugenics based on bigotry and ignorance as the motivation.
With abortion, I'm not sure what minority group is targeted by bigotry and ignorance. With the excpetion of when abortions are indeed motivated by such irrationality -- such as the case with female fetuses in India.
A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment