I predict the future will be much like an episode of the Outer Limits
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it ethical to turn potentionally gay babies straight?
Collapse
X
-
i might be a disease, but i dont have any. yayyyy.Originally posted by General Ludd
why are you posting here? You're spreading like a disease.

parents shouldn't care if their kids are gay or not.
my dad = homophobe.
my siblings are all young tho so idk which way they go yet.
Comment
-
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.Originally posted by The Mad Monk
If you can abort them for any reason, it follows that you can "adjust" them as well.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
Comment
-
Originally posted by General Ludd
why are you posting here? You're spreading like a disease.
Great way to welcome newbies
I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.
Asher on molly bloom
Comment
-
I think he knows her from Eventis (cue someone to say "WTF is Eventis").
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
In India lots of parents have their female children aborted already, as opposed to male children that are welcomed. It evidently creates a completely distorted society with an overabundance of men, in some rural areas complete villages are nearly devoid of women!Originally posted by Darius871
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
I'm not saying it's ethically right, but in this situation it might be ethically better to alter the gender, even if it has the same results as traditional abortions would have.
Besides that it'd be interesting to research, but foolish to implement. Nature provides us with close to 50/50 men/women; let's -for practical reasons- not mess with that."An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
"Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darius871
This is the most interesting part of the topic to me.
Wouldn't claiming it's unethical to alter the sexual preference of a fetus be premised on a violation of its rights as an individual? If so, wouldn't that have serious implications for the abortion debate?
With this issue, I guess I see a problem with using eugenics based on bigotry and ignorance as the motivation.
With abortion, I'm not sure what minority group is targeted by bigotry and ignorance. With the excpetion of when abortions are indeed motivated by such irrationality -- such as the case with female fetuses in India.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
What difference does it make what motivation there is? The fact remains that you have no right to tell a woman what to do with her own body.Originally posted by MrFun
With this issue, I guess I see a problem with using eugenics based on bigotry and ignorance as the motivation.
Comment
Comment