Originally posted by Lorizael
You know, for a long time I've held the position that trans fats are bad and should be illegal.
But ****, if tobacco companies can produce and sell cigarettes legally, why can't restaurants prepare food with trans fats in them?
I think smoking is stupid. I think it shouldn't be done. And I think it's good that cigarettes have warnings on them. But if the government thinks it's okay to sell them, what business does the government have in saying trans fats shouldn't be sold?
Is New York City really saying that trans fats are more dangerous than cigarettes?
You know, for a long time I've held the position that trans fats are bad and should be illegal.
But ****, if tobacco companies can produce and sell cigarettes legally, why can't restaurants prepare food with trans fats in them?
I think smoking is stupid. I think it shouldn't be done. And I think it's good that cigarettes have warnings on them. But if the government thinks it's okay to sell them, what business does the government have in saying trans fats shouldn't be sold?
Is New York City really saying that trans fats are more dangerous than cigarettes?
I don't support banning it. But I do support forcing them to offer french fries made without transfats. Obviously that woudl require more ingredients and equipement. it'd be easier just to eliminate transfats. But at least they have a choice.
Comment