Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It seems like the Dems will be taking both houses of Congress.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It seems like the Dems will be taking both houses of Congress.

    At least if the election were held today though we still have a month to go. Slate has a great article on this showing the breakdown of the Senate races where the numbers are as follows:

    Noncompetitive Seats (meaning landslide for one side): Dems 27 Reps 40
    Safe Seats (meaning pretty big leads): Dems 18 Reps 8
    Leans one way seats (Slight lead): Dems 4 Reps 1
    Tossup: 2 seats

    That means it is likely to be 50 seats for dems and 48 for Republicans with 2 seats unknown at this time. If the dems take one or both they win control while if the Reps take both seats then they tie.

    Here's the Slate article:
    Election Scorecard
    Where the midterm elections stand today.
    By Mark Blumenthal and Charles Franklin
    Updated Thursday, Oct. 12, 2006, at 6:33 PM ET



    Which party would control the U.S. Senate if the election were held today? The numbers below show the leaders based on averages of the most recent polls in each state. The "momentum shift" meter indicates statistically meaningful trends in recent polls of competitive races. How did we get these numbers and what do they mean?



    Senate Race Summary for Oct. 12:
    The race for the U.S. Senate is looking closer than ever, thanks to a surge for Bob Menendez in New Jersey. Two new surveys out in New Jersey today from Quinnipiac University and Rasmussen Reports show Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez leading Republican Thomas Kean Jr. by margins of four and five percentage points, respectively. Menendez has now run ahead of Kean by at least three points on five of the last six surveys. His four-point lead (45 percent to 41 percent) on our last-five-poll average moves New Jersey to the "lean Democrat" column.

    So, as of today, the race for the Senate looks like a dead heat, with 49 seats leaning or held by Democrats and 49 seats leaning or help by Republicans. The two remaining tossups are Tennessee and Missouri.

    Speaking of Tennessee, a new Rasmussen poll out late yesterday shows Democrat Harold Ford a statistically insignificant two points ahead of Republican Bob Corker (48 percent to 46 percent). That's the opposite of the SurveyUSA result we noted yesterday, showing Corker ahead by two. Although Ford leads narrowly on our last-five-poll average (46.6 percent to 44.2 percent), his margin remains close enough to classify Tennessee as a tossup.
    Which party would control the U.S. Senate if the election were held today? The numbers below show the leaders based on averages of the most recent poll ...
    Last edited by Dinner; October 12, 2006, 19:25.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

  • #2
    Ever since Folleygate broke Republican candidates have been taking a beating in their poll numbers. The Dems need to pick up 15 seats in the House to take control and at last count (some two weeks ago) some thirty Rep seats were considered to be in danger with about 18-20 of them leaning towards the democratic challenger. That means even if the Democrats don't do as well as expected they are likely to take control of the house.

    Personally, I see this as fitting even if I put my personal desire to see the Republicans out of office aside since the Republicans have really run out of ideas. The latest do nothing Congress is ample proof for that.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      Noncompetitive Seats (meaning landslide for one side): Dems 27 Reps 40


      No, that's not what non-competitive means, Oerdin..

      Comment


      • #4
        In this context it means everyone already knows who is going to win those seats and the other side has effectively given up on them. In other words it will be a landslide for one side.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #5
          No, it means they're not up for election.

          Comment


          • #6
            Oerdin can hardly make a thread without pwning himself.

            That said, if the Dems don't win in this cycle, when they have everything in the world going for them, then it will be an incredible failure on the part of the party.
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #7
              I can see the democrats taking the Senate, but I don't think that they will take the house.

              Comment


              • #8
                New polls from SUSA show Brown and McCaskill with huge leads (14 and 9, respectively). Whitehouse seems consistently up by near 10 points since the primary. Tester has been at around that area for a while. And Ford is starting to pull away. It really looks like we'll get a Democratic Senate at this point. Maybe even a four-vote margin for Reid if Webb pulls it off.

                And by the latest indy polls, the Republican majority in the House looks pretty damn close to reversing (i.e. Dems having a ~10 seat margin). Constituent Dynamics' poll dumps look very favorable. It's a little bit amazing...
                "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                -Bokonon

                Comment


                • #9
                  Those house races seem to have their numbers shift on a daily basis.
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I can see the democrats taking the Senate, but I don't think that they will take the house.


                    Dems taking the Senate, but not the House would be extremely, extremely improbable...
                    "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                    -Bokonon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ramo
                      I can see the democrats taking the Senate, but I don't think that they will take the house.


                      Dems taking the Senate, but not the House would be extremely, extremely improbable...
                      Agreed. In fact, Dems taking the Senate at all would be extremely improbable. They'd have to take all three races Slate currently considers tossups (MO, TN, RI); given that Mo and TN have been trending Red in general, and the RI race features a reasonably popular moderate GOP incumbent, a Dem trifecta seems really, really unlikely.

                      But one can dream, certainly.
                      "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hopefully the Reps will retain full control for two more years. The country will survive, but they won't be able to blame a decade of failure and corruption on the Dems having a slim margin in one house of Congress for two years. '08 is the big prize.
                        When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A chance at both houses... you know that the Dems havea messed things up more often recently than the Reps.

                          jm
                          Jon Miller-
                          I AM.CANADIAN
                          GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            RI hasn't been a toss-up since the primary ended. The polls pretty consistently show Chafee several points down (Rasmussen's latest shows him down by 9). Both MO and TN at this point should be considered slightly Dem, rather than a toss-up. But you're right in those two races are very close. And also the Dems have to defend NJ, although Menendez seems to pulling away.

                            I'd call a Senate takeover at around 1/3.
                            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                            -Bokonon

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Jon Miller
                              A chance at both houses... you know that the Dems havea messed things up more often recently than the Reps.

                              jm
                              How on Earth do you figure that?
                              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X