Ann Coulter: "Save me Sean!"

[Barnabas]

Is that her, she looks cute

And could someone explain me the thread, please

[DrS]

Doesn't the adam's apple freak you out? ewww.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Bloke in a dress!

[Elok]

I think some of you have got it backwards. How her physical attractiveness is rated is dependent largely on how one perceives her arguments. Liberals see the aggressive insanity and note that her unusually strong features look creepily mannish and amazonian. Conservatives see someone who agrees with them, and see soft blond hair and a big rack. As a moderate who nonetheless thinks she's bonkers, I see a sorta meh face with a glaring look about it, but methinks Ted, or another guy would hit it after a few beers.

[Guynemer]

Originally posted by Elok
I think some of you have got it backwards. How her physical attractiveness is rated is dependent largely on how one perceives her arguments. Liberals see the aggressive insanity and note that her unusually strong features look creepily mannish and amazonian. Conservatives see someone who agrees with them, and see soft blond hair and a big rack. As a moderate who nonetheless thinks she's bonkers, I see a sorta meh face with a glaring look about it, but methinks Ted, or another guy would hit it after a few beers.

I know I've made the joke several times, but...

Ted or another drunk guy would get his dick biten off by her vaginal teeth.

[Sava]

Originally posted by General Ludd
Why the **** do people talk about her physical attractiveness and sexual appeal as if it's supposed to validate her opinions, or reflect on her some how? The right drools and calls her sexy while the left calls an ugly whore, or ****, or *****, ect...

I agree with you to some extent. A person's physical appearance generally has little to do with their points. However, I would say that how a person presents themself plays a part in their overall credibility and reveals a lot about their character and personality... only as far as hygiene, grooming, and attire are concerned. Especially when we are talking about a public appearance like TV.

But as far as Coulter is concerned, because she makes so many inflammatory attacks and accusations, her points are generally not worth being analyzed and debated in a logical manner. Hence, I find it perfectly acceptable to just call her any number of names. If she were making legitimate points using rational, logical arguments, then I would take exception to the way many people treat her.

But she deserves exactly the treatment she gets because of the way she presents her points.

[BlackCat]

On the same site there are a story about Katherine Harris - is she for real and do you have many such maniacs amongst your politicians ? She makes me pretty

[MrFun]

Re: Ann Coulter: "Save me Sean!"

Originally posted by Lonestar

http://www.crooksandliars.com/

Ann get's *****slapped by the Colmes stand-in.

That was laugh-out-loud funny.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
Is that her, she looks cute

And could someone explain me the thread, please

Ann Coulter is an ugly Neo-Nazi prone to making deliberately outragous and stupid comments in order to get media attention to sell her equally stupid and Neo-Nazi books. Fox News LOVES her and puts her on TV all the time. I think that says something about the quality (or lack there of) at Fox News.

[GePap]

IN term of the video, one of the points is that Hannity, the conservative goon, commonly simply talks over guests, and as of yet, they don;t seem to cry about it. For once, someone talks over Coulter, and she cries about not being able to answer over the hate speech.

So, for once the Liberal commentator was as rude as the conservative commnetator, and the right-wing guest starts crying about it, unlike the Lefties who don't.

IE Ann Coulter is a wimp.

[Dr Strangelove]

Wouldn't it have been more useful to let her have her say then take her argument apart in detail?

[GePap]

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Wouldn't it have been more useful to let her have her say then take her argument apart in detail?

Cable Opinon talk shows are not designed to do so. If they were, Coulter would have been taken apart years ago.

Those shows thrive on conflict and screaming, and people making pronouncements, and at the end, no one is "wrong" unless they allowed themselves to be cowed, or were screamed down effectively enough.

That is why I don't watch them regularly, and why its a pity that serious debate on TV is barely existant.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Wouldn't it have been more useful to let her have her say then take her argument apart in detail?

Hard to do in a 30 second sound bite.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by General Ludd
Why the **** do people talk about her physical attractiveness and sexual appeal

Actually, the fact that she admits to being sexually promiscuous should have some bearing on her opinion if she claims to also be a fundie Christian. Maybe, though, that's a little hard for you to grasp.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Sava

But as far as Coulter is concerned, because she makes so many inflammatory attacks and accusations, her points are generally not worth being analyzed and debated in a logical manner. Hence, I find it perfectly acceptable to just call her any number of names. If she were making legitimate points using rational, logical arguments, then I would take exception to the way many people treat her.

But she deserves exactly the treatment she gets because of the way she presents her points.

No woman deserves to be objectified into being nothing more than a **** or a whore - a filthy, ugly, useless receptical. And likewise, the fetishism of agreeing with her is just as distasteful - as if you can't agree with her without making a remark about her breasts.

I don't see right wingers saying "I support Bush on this issue. Plus he's a real stud, too" or, for that matter, I don't see leftists baselessly insulting his sexuality by calling him a fudge packer or a ******.
Only female public figures have to face this bull****.