Ann Coulter: "Save me Sean!"

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Actually, the fact that she admits to being sexually promiscuous should have some bearing on her opinion if she claims to also be a fundie Christian. Maybe, though, that's a little hard for you to grasp.

My comment wasn't actually directed at you, but hte commentary on the website. But regardless, do you call al promiscuous people sluts?

[chequita guevara]

Pretty much, yeah.

However, I have no real problem with gender specific insults, like ***** or bastard.

[Saras]

Originally posted by notyoueither
Most sensible thing you've said, Mr. Ludd.

Corrected.

[Berzerker]

Well, I dislike her because (1) She's stupid, (2) a Chickenhawk, and (3) Is a fundie.

Huh, none of the above... Hypocrite? For sure, writes a book called Slander and writes another accusing Democrats and/or liberals of treason. Now she has "Godless" out for mass consumption but if we did an extensive comparison of what Jesus taught and what she preaches, she'd be much closer to the anti-Christ.

As for Sean Hannity, the guy really does have a fascistic streak to his ideology. Nah, he just becomes fascistic when a Repub Prez is under fire. But he has this habit of accusing people of hating or opposing "America" for not supporting Bush and his policies.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara

Actually, the fact that she admits to being sexually promiscuous should have some bearing on her opinion if she claims to also be a fundie Christian. Maybe, though, that's a little hard for you to grasp.

I don't know much about her. Where did she do this?

[chequita guevara]

I ferget where, but someone mentioned it in an interview a few years back and her reply was, "So I have lots of promiscuous sex. Yay for me."

[SpencerH]

If we have to put up with the left-wing whining pussys that the left allow to be their talking heads then they have to put up with nutjobs like Coulter.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I ferget where, but someone mentioned it in an interview a few years back and her reply was, "So I have lots of promiscuous sex. Yay for me."

Uh huh.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I ferget where, but someone mentioned it in an interview a few years back and her reply was, "So I have lots of promiscuous sex. Yay for me."

So this is a lie?

[mrmitchell]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi



You're right. It shouldn't matter how pretty or how beautiful, her opinions would be valid or invalid regardless of her physical attractiveness. It's just the icing on the cake.

Ben, I'm sorry to hear about your blindness.

[Barnabas]

Apolyton, where Condi is sexy

[Spiffor]

[Sava]

Originally posted by General Ludd



No woman deserves to be objectified into being nothing more than a **** or a whore - a filthy, ugly, useless receptical. And likewise, the fetishism of agreeing with her is just as distasteful - as if you can't agree with her without making a remark about her breasts.

I don't see right wingers saying "I support Bush on this issue. Plus he's a real stud, too" or, for that matter, I don't see leftists baselessly insulting his sexuality by calling him a fudge packer or a ******.
Only female public figures have to face this bull****.

This should be obvious to most intelligent people: People usually get attacked in ways that are "fitting". The guy who looks like a monkey gets called "Chimp". The guy who seems to take a stance on an issue then change his mind gets called a "flip-flopper".

People will also attack someone more viciously if said person offers their "points" in such a manner that angers a large constituency... and, as I pointed out in my earlier post, if said person makes no bones about offering such vicious attacks herself.

IMO, anyone who attacks people and says such inflammatory things (as Coulter does), deserves to be attacked in the same manner. It makes no difference if they are a woman or not. To treat women differently when they make such remarks would be sexist. Treating people equally goes both ways. When the gloves come off, it's every person for themselves.

If Coulter didn't make such inflammatory attacks against others, then I would agree that such remarks about her would be inappropriate. But she does deserve exactly the treatment she gets because of the things she says. She has nobody to blame for that treatment but herself.

It's not her opinions that are the reason people attack her, it's the manner in which she presents them.

[Elok]

I believe she also has a rather high opinion of her own appearance anyway. Didn't she mock some Democratic convention's women as "a bunch of fragrant, unwashed, no-bra-needing hippies" or something?

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Sava


This should be obvious to most intelligent people: People usually get attacked in ways that are "fitting". The guy who looks like a monkey gets called "Chimp". The guy who seems to take a stance on an issue then change his mind gets called a "flip-flopper".

And the woman who does either gets called an ugly ****, a *****, and a prostitute.