Liberals are controlling overpopulation -- in the Democratic Party

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by VJ
but Apolyton OTF would sure be a lot more of a high-quality place to visit if we'd cut the lies and all the crap off our posts.

How would people post then?

[RGBVideo]

well, "crap" is relative.

let's just settle for "lies" ok? i'll edit it

[MrFun]

Originally posted by DanS


I don't think this is primarily fundamentalist christians. Catholics, mormons, pro-family christians and atheists, etc.

Pro-family is really a biased, loaded term based on distortion.

[DanS]

Nah, I think it is a suitably descriptive term.

[RGBVideo]

i'm still waiting for that source, Dan

[DanS]

Go ask the article writer or start googling.

[RGBVideo]

Yay, it's the smiley face with goggles again. You're getting predictable Dan, everytime you get caught up from supporting a blatant lie you answer with it as the message icon.

But yeah, discuss the issue not the posters: Because the entire article is based on the claim that four fifths of children grow up to vote like their parents do, I don't believe there's much to discuss until that claim is proven. And it won't be proven. So more pointless and cynical exchanges of talking points between the usual suspects will follow then, I guess. Meh.

[DanS]

You want that I would do your work for you? Are you lazy? If you think the number is BS, then show it. Or just say that it's BS without any backup. I don't care.

[RGBVideo]

Originally posted by DanS
I don't care.

me neither. which makes this a crappy spam thread.

[DanS]

Meh. Then stop posting on the thread. No skin off my back.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Actually these things usually deveolve into an actual refutation by another link, an attack on the source as being noncredible partisan hack site, or confirmation by another link.

BAMs saying things are lies usually doesn't fly. At the least they are usually deflected by "teh look at teh source its Rush Limbaughs site" defense.

[Elok]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Africans tend to be jerks.

Not in my experience, though it's been several years since I really interacted with immigrants--I moved to lily-white Caroline County two years ago. But compared to the native black population of PGC, they were typically much nicer. They didn't have the huge racial chip on their shoulder. Of course, I'm really generalizing here.

[RGBVideo]

BAMs saying things are lies usually doesn't fly.

your momma is a bald assertion man. The entire article is based on this single claim which sounds widely inconceivable and which is not supported with by a single proof. If you say that a majority of all the people agree that crap sandwiches taste good because 80% of all the people say that they taste good and everyone who thinks that crap sandwiches taste bad are in a minority, people tend to look forward seeing some proof. Science is non-partisan, so even a basic survey with a 4% MoE would work.

but we get nothing

So, it's a crappy spam thread, with content-producer of the original poster being the actual BAM. You know, the assertion that four fifths of the children of the people who vote for party X also vote for party X?

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

I understand you don't beleive it. Prove it then.

[RGBVideo]

I don't have to prove it precisely because it's not my claim, or as you put it, I'm not the man throwing bald assertions

the writer in the original post is the BAM, he pulled an unbelievable figure which he based his entire article on and didn't prove it

I'm not the guy who has to prove it, on the contrary I'm the guy calling "BS" and waiting for the proof.

And we all know it isn't coming. So yeah: crappy spam article linked in the original post --> crappy spam thread.