Liberals are controlling overpopulation -- in the Democratic Party

[Eroberer]

Well, my point may have been a little cryptic. BillO likes to think that he's the underdog in everything, but this topic clearly shows that he's really not, what with the conservative's population advantage. Also, if you believe him, then "the media" is a subversive leftist outlet, which, if it ACTUALLY were, would probably turn more than 20% of people away from voting like their conservative parents. Do you disagree?

edit: I should probably mention that I first learned the original poster's factoid from O'Reilly himself a while ago, thus the reaction.

[Darius871]

Why should we care what Bill O'Reilly thinks?

[Eroberer]

Well, I guess I'm just pointing out his hypocrisy, since I learned about the original poster's fact from him. He has said that millions of people think just like him, and the numbers really show it, but he still sets himself up as the underdog on everything.

In other foxNews, Neil Cavuto just said of his viewers, "some of you have had some pretty choice words for George Soros....". I think that helpfully counterbalances O'Reilly's point about with the word "repugnant" to describe that dumbass on his show last night. His obsession with one word, of course, proves silly.

[RGBVideo]

so i was wrong...

Originally posted by Darius871
Oddly enough we were assigned a literature review in a class the same week this topic piqued my interest, so I dug up about a dozen:

Awesome, thank You. I asked for information and I received it. That was a very interesting and an enlightening summary.

You deserve an A for both the format and the information -- did you get one?

[Darius871]

Thanks; it's not due 'til tomorrow but I sure hope I will.