Tweet
The side that had masses... and allied support.
-
-
Oh, no, not this sh!t again.
Comment
-
I've made two very straight and common points. Which of them are you trying to put into doubt?
Comment
-
What masses?Comment
-
Are you forgetting about those 20 millions the USSR lost during that war? 13 million of them were soldiers IIRC. Considering the Wehrmacht lost about 3 million soldiers during the entire war, you're not claiming the USSR didn't fight with the advantage of larger numbers? This doesn't deny later technical superiority, implies no judgement either. Just facts, ma'am.Comment
-
Germany and its allies lost 10 million. And if the nazi had treated their prisoners like soviets did, the ratio would have been in Soviet's favour.Comment
-
Who are you trying to fool?Comment
-
Nobody.Comment
-
It seems you have no data.Comment
-
I do, my sources speak of much less than 10 million losses for Germany and allies. Japanese victims in the pacific and in China don't count.
Also, everyone knows Russians fought without guns and in fear of being shot by their own officers.Comment
-
That's all. I have no further questions.
Keep living in your fancy fantasy world. I'm out of here.
Good night.Comment
-
Goodnight. Don't beat your wife too hard. It really isn't her fault.Comment
-
Idiot.Comment
-
That was easy.Comment
-
Silly question, silly answer.Originally posted by Serb
What a silly question.
The next election looks like it will be between McCain and Clinton so far."And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
2004 Presidential Candidate
2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)Comment
Comment