China vs India War: Who Wins? (No Nukes)

[Terra Nullius]

GePap

MOst Indian's are not well educated.

Compared to what? Most westerners are not highly educated either.

I don't have time to get precise figures, but down south especially, they have higher general literacy rates than a lot of western countries.

And apart from general literacy, higher education in India is nothing to sneer at.

Look at Indian films. How many are in English, how many in HIndu, Urdu, or one of the many other languages?

Bollywood making films in Urdu.

Now that, I'd like to see.

Most indians are poor and live in villages.

Same goes for Texas.

But India has better dancing girls.

They aren;t getting regular English classes.

Ummm, yes. They are.

Ever tried conducting a conversation in Hindi down south?
You won't get far. The southern states tend to distrust the northerners and resist the use of Hindi. Since every state speaks a different language, and most use unique scripts, the main second language throughout southern India is, in fact, English.

[Terra Nullius]

Ally in the War on Terror and that ****.

Ally McBeal's getting involved?

**** that means dealing with Harrison!

And Dame Edna!! You guys are on your own.

[Frozzy]

Originally posted by TheStinger
Were the UK and US at war with Finland during ww2

UK was. Unsure about US.

[TheStinger]

Next question- was Finland democratic?

[Frozzy]

Originally posted by notyoueither
I'd bet the nonexistant country doesn't have any iron either, that's why they couldn't build knights to keep themselves a country while all the other countries were running around with knights and making provinces out of places that should be nonexistant countries, and stuff.

zapatopi.net/belgium/

[Frozzy]

Originally posted by TheStinger
Next question- was Finland democratic?

Ish.

[TheStinger]

So there is an example of 2 representative govts being at war

[Drake Tungsten]

Why go for the tortuous example when Japan had a representative government during WWII?

[TheStinger]

I didn't htink it was that torturous. When the term representative govt was used I took it to mean by and large democratic, not something that the Japenese could claim.

[Colon™]

Then you might just as well reconsider how much substance there really was to the war between UK and Finland.

[Drake Tungsten]

Japan was democratic, by and large, albeit a democracy that fell under the control of an ultranationalist and imperialist military, mainly due to a lack of liberal institutions to curtail their rising influence in politics. It wasn't a liberal democracy, but it was a democracy and therefore representative, IMO.

[lord of the mark]

It is absolutely impossible to tell how India and China would fare against each other without knowing the location and extent of the war, or the levels of support from others. Which in turn are impossible to tell without knowing the political and diplomatic circumstances leading up to war.

The two gentlemen who are debating who would intervene on behalf of whom, without specifying the scenario that would lead up to war, are both silly.

[Ecthy]

Originally posted by VetLegion
Interestingly, Belgium has more than three times the exports India has. India has a long way to go until it can challenge the Belgian war machine.

[SlowwHand]

Originally posted by Colon™


Hence the double irony back.

Wouldn't this lead to broke back?

[dannubis]

Originally posted by notyoueither
I'd bet the nonexistant country doesn't have any iron either, that's why they couldn't build knights to keep themselves a country while all the other countries were running around with knights and making provinces out of places that should be nonexistant countries, and stuff.

our non existant country was the most important trade centre in western europe even before your forefathers slaughtered the indians. your point ?