Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Double Amputee climbs everest...and passes by dying man w/o helping.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The way climbers describe conditions over 8000m, you are always at risk. You are hypoxic, it is only a matter of extent. The effort to keep moving is difficult.

    Should we lay odds on whether this guy survives another day?

    Look at it this way, this team knew Hall was in trouble and didn't organize any form of rescue, not until another climber finds him still alive and on the main route. Sharp's team didn't organize a rescue when he was spotted and reported to be in dire trouble.
    (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
    (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
    (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

    Comment


    • BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service


      Hall is in the safe zone and reported to be in reasonable good condition.

      Blackcat: I didn't say they're inhumane. Compare to debates about war-atrocities for instance: whenever there's such a discussion there's always going to be someone who says that it's war, and that the people discussing haven't been in one and that they don't know what it is like. That is true, and it is also true that most soldiers committing such atrocities aren't born psychopaths. That doesn't mean we can't discuss such actions though, nor that we should accept them just because combatants have different mores and are in a situation alien to most of us. (BTW, just to make clear, I'm not saying that the climbers' decision was similar to a war-atrocity - I'm just getting at the whole "a situation you haven't experiencied yourself" thingy)
      DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

      Comment


      • Ah, yes, it took eleven Sherpas to get this man down! This is what I was trying to say before: the level of effort required to take somebody down was beyond what the team passing Sharp could supply.

        Perhaps if the whole team scrubbed their ascent, and half the climbers were of such experience, strength, and conditioning that they could double up and descend without Sherpas, then enough Sherpas could be spared to try to move Sharp. Apparently that wasn't the case.
        (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
        (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
        (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

        Comment


        • They should at least stopped and pissed on him to keep him warm
          So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
          Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Colon™
            For chrissake, how many times do I have repeat this crap? IS IT REALLY THIS HARD to make a distinction between "endangering their own lives by helping him" and "as good as dead anyway"? You don't need to be a friggin lawyer to understand what the difference is.
            Exactly, one is the action of a hero.
            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
            "Capitalism ho!"

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Colon™
              For chrissake, how many times do I have repeat this crap? IS IT REALLY THIS HARD to make a distinction between "endangering their own lives by helping him" and "as good as dead anyway"? You don't need to be a friggin lawyer to understand what the difference is.
              Note that Dan Mazur did not try to rescue Hall, but only gave him hot tea and oxygen. The article did not mention what condition Hall was in when discovered.
              (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
              (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
              (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

              Comment


              • That's wrong. He and his team did effectively rescue him, by radioing for help. As for Mr. Hall's condition, a little more research would have given you more information.



                'Dead' Climber's Survival Impugns Mount Everest Ethics
                By ALAN COWELL
                LONDON, May 27 — It has been a lethal and quirky climbing season on Mount Everest, with at least 15 deaths recorded or rumored so far.

                But no episode seemed quite so strange as the story of Lincoln Hall, a 50-year-old Australian climber, who was a 16th. But only for a while.

                His tale, which emerged here on Saturday, offered an inspiring counterpoint to the grim end of a British solo climber, David Sharp, 34, who was left to die on May 15 as some 40 other climbers passed him on their own attempts to reach the 29,035-foot peak.

                That case revived a passionate debate over the ethics of high altitude climbing, particularly in what is called the death zone, where conditions, temperatures and the lack of oxygen combine to mean that rescuers may forfeit their own lives in trying to save a sick or incapacitated climber.

                Mr. Hall, one of Australia's best-known climbers, was on an expedition whose members paid a minimum of $16,000, according to its Web site. The group included a 15-year-old Australian climber, Chris Harris, who had hoped to become the youngest climber to reach the summit.

                He was forced to turn back after having problems breathing, but Mr. Hall and others made it to the top on Thursday.

                Accounts on Saturday, pieced together from expedition Web sites and newspaper articles, said that on the descent, Mr. Hall suddenly collapsed. He was pronounced dead by the sherpa guides accompanying him and abandoned at 28,500 feet. The cause was understood to be cerebral edema — a swelling of the brain.

                The next day, according to accounts from Mr. Hall's fellow climbers, he was seen by Dan Mazur, an American veteran of many Himalayan expeditions. Mr. Mazur, they said, realized that Mr. Hall was still alive. Almost incomprehensibly, he survived the night.

                "Lincoln was motionless, but submitted weak attributes of life," Alex Abramov, the Russian leader of the expedition, said on its Web site (http://www.7summits-club.com/).

                The expedition dispatched a team of 13 sherpas to rescue him. Three sherpas with "tea, oxygen and medicines have reached Lincoln," the expedition Web site reported Friday.

                "Lincoln has a rest, drinks tea. He in consciousness, however not completely understands what happens," Mr. Abramov wrote on the Web site.

                It ascribed his initial weakness on the mountain to an "acute edema and hypoxia," meaning he was not getting enough oxygen.

                By 10 p.m. local time Thursday, Mr. Hall and his rescuers were said to have descended to a camp at about 23,000 feet on the North Col of Everest. And by Saturday, "Lincoln Hall was able to walk on his own" to the Advanced Base Camp farther down the mountain.

                The fact that he had been able to walk unassisted was taken as testimony to a remarkable recovery and raised the question of what might have happened to the Briton, David Sharp, if he had been helped.

                "We will never know the whole story of who helped David and who did not," the EverestNews.com Web site said Saturday, as it published a photograph of the rock cave where Mr. Sharp died. "We will never know the whole story of his summit attempt and descent, where he ended up next to the previously dead climber in the rock cave on Everest. But we do know where he froze to death on Everest."

                The climbing season had been an unusual one for records. A New Zealander, Mark Inglis, the first double amputee to reach the summit earlier this month, was one of the climbers who passed the dying Mr. Sharp on his way up the mountain.

                Mr. Inglis told New Zealand television: "Trouble is at 8,500 meters, it's extremely difficult to keep yourself alive, let alone keeping anyone else alive. On that morning over 40 people went past this young Briton."

                Mr. Inglis said he radioed for help but a fellow mountaineer told him: "Look, mate, you can't do anything. You know, he's been there X number of hours, been there without oxygen, you know, he's effectively dead."

                The episode provoked a sharp dispute with Sir Edmund Hillary, the New Zealander who, with Sherpa Tenzing Norgay, made the first verifiable conquest of Everest in 1953. Sir Edmund said that "people have completely lost sight of what is important."

                "In our expedition, there was never any likelihood whatsoever if one member of the party was incapacitated that we would just leave him to die," he told a New Zealand newspaper, The Otago Daily Times.
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment

                Working...
                X