i thought changing formations doesnt mean anything since they are professional players and have no problems adapting.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
World Football Thread VIII - The beautiful game?
Collapse
X
-
I didn't say they failed to adapt to the formation did I? What I'm saying is that the 4-3-3 isn't right for the US squad and the friendly showed it. Arena likes to play around with formations in friendlies to see what works and what doesn't. The 4-3-3 doesn't work.Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
i thought changing formations doesnt mean anything since they are professional players and have no problems adapting.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Pre-world cup friendly results are meaningless. They are normally even more lackluster than normal friendlies because none of the players wants to get injured.
The US does have a very tough group though.
27,000 is a great size for a football stadium. Better to have sell-outs and people desperately trying to get tickets for big games than have a consistently 1/3 empty stadium.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
For those interested....I found the BBC are doing a stock exchange on the World Cup. I thought it might warrant a separate thread.
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
Comment
-
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
What's a chucker?Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment
-
Someone who chucks (throws) the ball - that is, doesn't bowl with a proper action. For fast bowlers, the action is supposed to involve the forearm practically brushing the ear, with the arm extended upwards, and while spinners are allowed a little leeway with this, Malinga's action seems to involve the arm at a 45 degree angle between head and shoulder - a definite no-no.Originally posted by alva
What's a chucker?
I don't care about England, although I wouldn't have minded watching the match because I love footie in all its forms. Sadly, I don't have council-house telly.
Comment
-
Ah, thanks.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment
-
I don't care about England, although I wouldn't have minded watching the match because I love footie in all its forms. Sadly, I don't have council-house telly.
I highly recommend watching the first Belarus goal to anyone who hasn't seen it.
Robert Green was taking a goal kick, scuffed it and fell over with a serious injury. If it wasn't so funny it would have been tragic. Anywho, the fair playing Belarussian decided that he should score a goal while the keeper was down writhing in agony rather than actually kick the ball out.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
Comment


Comment