and yet, he keeps coming back...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Down with the evil Gas lords III: Kaak's Redemption
Collapse
X
-
"Mal nommer les choses, c'est accroître le malheur du monde" - Camus (thanks Davout)
"I thought you must be dead ..." he said simply. "So did I for a while," said Ford, "and then I decided I was a lemon for a couple of weeks. A kept myself amused all that time jumping in and out of a gin and tonic."
-
Stop talking about yourself in the third person, you funny little man.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnT
Kid doesn't believe in the time value of money.
******************
Wasn't it KrazyHorse who pointed out that there are pipelines running all over the U.S.? Well, if U.S. ecology regulations are bogging down the building of new refineries, why doesn't someone build a refinery in Mexico right across the border from the U.S., hook into the U.S. system, and pump gigagallons of gasoline into the U.S. economy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious
No. There were very good projects. They didn't build them.
Name one with the details of what made it a very good projectYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zkribbler
Name: Refinery construction.
Details: Worldwide increased demand for gasoline + record price for gasoline.
Catch up-- To be a even a good project the PROJECTIONS at the time they would have had to have STARTED must be "good" (meaning a risk weighted return that meets or beats other possible projects requiring similar amounts of capital and expertise)
Since building a refinery is equally available to EVERYONE who can raise the capital , I put forth the idea that if a "very good" project ( ie better than the criteria for a "good" project) were available, someone would have done it.You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment
-
I have read an interesting article (from communist Newspaper l'Humanité, which doesn't have any sympathy for the majors), in which the cost of gas at the pump is laid out (French prices for one litre):
Crude oil: 0.38€
Refining: 0.05€
Transportation + retail: 0.05€
Taxes: 0.82€
Indeed, refining represents very little in the cost of gas. I expected refining to be a more component of the price. I have much less of a quibble with the relationship between gas price and oil price now."I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flubber
Since building a refinery is equally available to EVERYONE who can raise the capital , I put forth the idea that if a "very good" project ( ie better than the criteria for a "good" project) were available, someone would have done it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zkribbler
There's a old saying that, according to the laws of economics, it is impossible to find a $20 bill laying in the street because if it were really there, someone would have already picked it up.
1. the $20 was never there to be picked up OR
2. you are the first to see the $20
With respect to refinery projects, case 1 is that there was never an economic opportunity while case 2 is that the opportunity was never seen. I reject the implicit case 3 that the $20 was seen by dozens of people but no one bothered to pick it upYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spiffor
Indeed, refining represents very little in the cost of gas. I expected refining to be a more component of the price. I have much less of a quibble with the relationship between gas price and oil price now.You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flubber
Actually thats a good little story. Fundamentally its true so if a $20 has not been picked up in the last 30 years it means
1. the $20 was never there to be picked up OR
2. you are the first to see the $20
With respect to refinery projects, case 1 is that there was never an economic opportunity while case 2 is that the opportunity was never seen. I reject the implicit case 3 that the $20 was seen by dozens of people but no one bothered to pick it up
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zkribbler
How 'bout Case 3(a): Lots of people saw the $20, but they reasoned the could become even richer by essacerbating a shortage by not picking it up.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
Comment