Tweet
Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Why not just use 593 tons of TNT then?
Why not just use 593 tons of TNT then?
I hate to think we think alike.
-
funny, I was thinking the same thing.
I hate to think we think alike.
-
Maybe this is some sort of air blast or whatever you have it, that this stuff sucks up oxygen when going boom, so it will kill a lot more people than TNT?Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Why not just use 593 tons of TNT then?
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."Comment
-
No current or projected plane will carry 700 tonnes, but we have conventional explosives that are many times more powerful per lb than ammonium nitrate pfuel mix. They are also many times more expensive, which is why the amonium nitrate fuel mix is being used in the test. The test is not for the pourposes of testing a bomb; convention shaped explosives are pretty cut and dried. It is to test the cratering and seismic shock effects of large convetional exposives, to see how deeply they can crack bunkers.Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
"Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"Comment
-
cant we just send a bunch of testosterone driven marines into the bunker?"I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburgerComment
-
Sounds the opening scene to a cheesy gay porn flick...The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.Comment
-
I believe that some of the larger cargo planes can carry up to 100 tons of cargo. We've dropped bombs from the back of cargo planes in the past. I think that dropping that much weight at one time would be very hard on a plane."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!Comment
-
It's hard to suck up oxygen when buried though...I'd thought of that possibilityOriginally posted by Urban Ranger
Maybe this is some sort of air blast or whatever you have it, that this stuff sucks up oxygen when going boom, so it will kill a lot more people than TNT? I presume it must be relative cost...
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
-
I see PH's OTBOT rating go through the roof. On the spam axis
Comment
-
Stop spamming!Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
-
So how long do those comments stay up there? I see it's all in Mark's power...Comment
-
Hehe...Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda SmithComment
-
random comments that stay up for a random amount of time.Comment
-
Russia's Antanov AN-225 (only one current built I believe) carries 250 metric tonnes (275 short tons).Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I believe that some of the larger cargo planes can carry up to 100 tons of cargo. We've dropped bombs from the back of cargo planes in the past. I think that dropping that much weight at one time would be very hard on a plane.The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.Comment
-
Originally posted by VetLegion
That'd be also Russian
built in 1915, the tsar tank...
[img]
http://www.geocities.com/MadisonAven...k_view_big.jpg[/img]
Comment
-
Cool stuff.Attached FilesComment
-
Comment