The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Yep, they had to base-isolate the whole building, in toher words, digging out the ground under the foundation and putting in giant springs.
The regilding of the dome was a little excessive though.
Visit First Cultural Industries There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd
As far as what people during WWII though, who cares. Most of them are dead or not long for the world anyway.
Well, its kinda relevant if the Iowa did more to protect SF than Davenport, true? Physically and mentally...
Anyway, a Japanese attack on the West Coast wasn't a serious threat. Even if we lost Hawaii we were effectively beyond the reach of a real attack (maybe a Doolittle type raid could be mounted).
And this would have been the case if the US didn't have ships like the Iowa? You're essentially citing the navy's success as a reason why SF didn't need it's protection.
As for the room problem, SF has more of it than most ports. I remember them parking carriers out at Hunter's Point for months at a time... a nice tourist attraction if nothing else. Now SF just pisses people off again and more people try to avoid visiting.
And the school system sounds about the same (or worse) than when I was there.
Originally posted by Berzerker
And this would have been the case if the US didn't have ships like the Iowa? You're essentially citing the navy's success as a reason why SF didn't need it's protection.
Wrong. The JIN didn't have the range to try and attack the U.S. mainland. Bascially they'd have needed to kick the U.S. out of Alaska, an extrodinarly unlikely possibility. Even then, U.S. airpower would have smashed their fleet.
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Originally posted by Lonestar
Not saying that gays shouldn't adopt, I'm saying these *******s would rather throw a cool $300mil down for a renovated city Hall than provide decent educational oppurtunities for the Kids.
Gosh who would have thought it. Next you'll be telling us that politicians vote themselves inflation-busting payrises at every available opportunity and claim tens of thousands of dollars of expenses every month on the most frivolous items.
They had no intention of attacking the US mainland in the first place. Their goal was to temporarily disable the American navy so that they had a free hand at expanding in East Asia. The attack on Pearl Harbour was already stretching Japanese logistic abilities to the limit.
Now that this is settled: post more battleship pictures
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment