Originally posted by Odin
Negative economic growth for at least 6 months. You learn that in HS civics.
What I am getting as is that using GDP as a benchmark makes no distintion about who is benifiting from the growth. The rich could be getting richer while wages stay stagnant and you would still get an GDP increase.
Negative economic growth for at least 6 months. You learn that in HS civics.

What I am getting as is that using GDP as a benchmark makes no distintion about who is benifiting from the growth. The rich could be getting richer while wages stay stagnant and you would still get an GDP increase.
Comment