Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Women are to blame for being raped

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts



  • Convictions in such situations are tough to acheive, even if the facts are such that she did say no and some force was used. Its tough to convict when the main witness may have been blacking out during much of the crime


    Why the hell should the guy be sued at all? might as well say the girl raped him.

    sexism
    urgh.NSFW

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Whoha


      yes they can, and I'm going to assume that its fairly infrequent, but that could just be a complete burying of the statistics.



      The UK's largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK.


      Very rare for women to commit rape in the Uk.
      To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield.

      Comment


      • Since they can't commit it, it's very rare indeed! Sexual assault cases are also very low, IIRC. Yes, it's a lot less likely to happen than it is the other way around, however as with all sexual crimes, especially those involving a lot of stigma attached (being sexually assaulted by a women would be a prime example of this), that only a very small percentage are reported.
        Smile
        For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
        But he would think of something

        "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

        Comment


        • Since they can't commit it, it's very rare indeed!


          My thoughts exactly!
          urgh.NSFW

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Agathon
            dp

            (no, not "double penetration" you bottom feeders... )
            No, not that kind of bottom feeder you...oh never mind.
            He's got the Midas touch.
            But he touched it too much!
            Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

            Comment


            • Women are responsible for bringing rapists into the world.
              "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Drogue
                Since they can't commit it, it's very rare indeed! Sexual assault cases are also very low, IIRC. Yes, it's a lot less likely to happen than it is the other way around, however as with all sexual crimes, especially those involving a lot of stigma attached (being sexually assaulted by a women would be a prime example of this), that only a very small percentage are reported.

                Uk law is very specific and women can and have been prosecucted for male rape. rare in this case isa handfull of cases.
                An Act to make new provision about sexual offences, their prevention and the protection of children from harm from other sexual acts, and for connected purposes.


                More Uk and European data here.http://www.truthaboutrape.co.uk/index2.html

                Rare in 2001 BCS for sexual assault is 190,000 per annum.

                Sexual assaualts are no190,000 incidents of serious sexual assault against women aged between 16 and 59 in England and Wales.
                Of these incidents an estimated 80,000 incidents of rape or attempted rape occurred.
                54% of rapists were current or former partners or boyfriends of the victim and only 17% were strangers.
                To strive, to seek, to find and not to yield.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Az


                  Convictions in such situations are tough to acheive, even if the facts are such that she did say no and some force was used. Its tough to convict when the main witness may have been blacking out during much of the crime


                  Why the hell should the guy be sued at all? might as well say the girl raped him.


                  sexism
                  Did you even READ my quote? The guy should be charged if he used force when someone said no. The fact that both are drunk should be irrelevent but it isn't because it impacts witnesses ability to recall. Its tough to get a conviction when the victim has to admit they don't recall portions of the events .

                  If its about being too drunk to give consent, I agree that I don't see why, in law, there shouild be a greater duty on the guy to ascertain the consent of the gal than the converse
                  You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                  Comment


                  • It wasn't a direct reply to you, to be honest, it's about the second part.

                    Therefore, .
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X