then from the point of view of that observer, the owner has lost his car. It is a crime because there is loss.
What if the observer knows that the owner is in a coma? I wouldn't think he'd consider it to be 'lost'. But it has been taken without his permission. It's a crime because there was a tresspass to his property.
This will be one DVD set that I will get from HBO.
), but how much of Rome is actually historically accurate? And how much is written? Obviously major things, like Caesar crossing the Rubicon, and perhaps general knowledge of affairs and minglings of the nobility, and things like the riot that prevented Marcus Antonius from casting his veto, but things like, the riot starting because someone came after Pullo surely do not have historic base.
Comment