To flog away at a dead horse, I note that the NPV calculation is very sensitive to the rate of sales increase decay. A 20% decay rate and the company is worth over $80 billion. A 22% decay rate and the company is worth under $60 billion. An 18% decay rate and the company is worth about $125 billion. All using a 20% discount rate.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Google does it again
Collapse
X
-
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
-
Originally posted by Wezil
1 in 5 would be impressive. I'm not a computer geek so I don't know of these things.
I know I rarely if ever click advertising links on websites.
Many people can't tell the difference. I have read about some research that said that in fact most can't.
Comment
-
yes, but look at your post. You searched on "buy house". The sponsored links on the right look like a much better match than the first 2 Amazon links.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
Didn't you know that everybody has a blog these days?I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
-
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Today, GOOG has a market capitalization of $105 billion, after only 7 years of being in business, some of which was in the Google boys dorm room and some in a garage.
Each of the Google boys is now worth about $13 billion on paper.I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
-
Plenty of IT bubbleites turned a profit back then. The problem was that the market value was grossly out of proportion to the size of the profits. (JDS Uniphase anyone?)DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Yes, but just put Google's earnings into a simple NPV calculation, like I have done above, and I think it wouldn't be proper to say that Google's market value is grossly out of proportion. If you don't agree, then give us your assumptions.I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
Comment
-
You sure your figures are correct? Assuming a predicted EPS of $5.86 for 2005 you get $1.6 billion net income, not the $890 million you got in your spreadsheet.
Anyhow, the expected EPS for 2005 is $5.86, and at the current price of $356 a share, that's a P/E of 60. Assuming a P/E between 10 and 15, the market is reckoning between $6.4 billion and $9.6 billion in net income. With a constant net profit marging of 25% that's between $25 billion and $40 billion in revenues.
This while they're not gaining market share in their core business (search engines) and Yahoo only has a P/E of 33.
I don't need to know much more.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
Comment