Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hillary, President

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Adam Smith
    I think it’s a little too easy to dismiss conservative criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton as misogyny. Less hysterical right-wingers have noted that she was involved in major policy decisions on a regular basis without ever being elected or confirmed. And when opposed by elected officials with differing views, Bill Clinton, with typical cheek, complained that these Evil Republicans were attacking his wife. But as Washington Post editorial noted at the time, if she is making policy decisions she is fair game, wife or not. It is true that other first ladies (Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosalyn Carter, maybe even Laura Bush) have had prominent roles, but I think this more explicit role, without ever being elected or confirmed, gives rise to some of the criticism. (Must have been real interesting to be in the Clinton White House with three different people who just know that they should be President.)
    That's not quite fair. Karl Rove wasn't elected or confirmed to anything. Neither was Condi Rice, from 2001-2005. Nor was Sidney Blumenthal in the Clinton White House, George Sununu in the Bush White House, or Michael Deaver in the Reagan White House.

    The fact is, the president's closest advisors [i]aren't[i] elected or confirmed; the Bush White House is actually rather unusual in having two or three (Cheney, Rumsfeld, now Rice) who are. But Hilary was between a rock and a hard place; she was criticized for making policy decisions without having any official capacity to do so but, had Bill actually appointed her to a position similar to Rove's or Blumenthal's (and, unlike Laura, she would be qualified for such a position), there would have been an even bigger GOP sh*tstorm to weather.
    "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

    Comment


    • Rove practically runs the White House yet he was never elected. Hillary certainly did less then Rove does now yet the right wingers never complain. Why?

      Anwser: Because they're hacks and they needed something to ***** about. They took unfair shots because that was the only shots they could find.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Oerdin

        Anwser: Because they're hacks and they needed something to ***** about. They took unfair shots because that was the only shots they could find.
        100% true
        We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

        Comment


        • I'm actually watching this show now.

          It's pretty good.

          Seeing as how there is a complete lack of competency and administration skills in the White House now, at least I can make myself feel better by watching it on tv.

          Wow! Allowing for multiple sources of input? Listening to your military experts? Encouraging people to actually disagree???
          We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

          Comment

          Working...
          X