Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When the hawks were doves.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by loinburger
    It's hypocrisy, dammit.
    "The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
    "Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Datajack Franit
      I don´t like Democrates complaining about Iraq when it´s all Clinton´s fault for turning the Balkans into a third-world subcontinent
      .

      Yes, once the Balcans was a thriving region, splendid economic conditions and civil society until Clinton bombed the whole region to the stone age.

      That said, I was rather undecided on the Kosovo-issue back then and didn't listen enough to the critics. Maybe Clinton had me hypnotized with his sax, dunno. Anyway, that was a mistake of mine I hope I've learnt from.
      "The world is too small in Vorarlberg". Austrian ex-vice-chancellor Hubert Gorbach in a letter to Alistar [sic] Darling, looking for a job...
      "Let me break this down for you, fresh from algebra II. A 95% chance to win 5 times means a (95*5) chance to win = 475% chance to win." Wiglaf, Court jester or hayseed, you judge.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Oerdin
        That was justified due to on going ethnic cleansing.
        Justified based on what standard? International law? Your own sense of morals?
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #34
          Both under international law and the moral standards of most civilized people.

          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

          Comment


          • #35
            It's Balkans, dammit.
            B♭3

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Oerdin
              Both under international law and the moral standards of most civilized people.

              http://anthonydamato.law.northwester...files/A995.pdf
              You didn't read this very well, since the bombing campagin of NATO violated the first rule, it violated the territorial integrity of Yugoslavia by intending to remove Kosovo from it. Since no finding of genocide was ever made, there was no legal justiifcation for the illegal war on Yugoslavia, except to point at Bosnia, where all sides were engaged in genocide.

              But to realize that would be to accept that you violated the laws of nations and the United States by participating in that illegal war.
              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

              Comment


              • #37
                Che, it said there were a number of different ways the war could be justified under international law. Just because one was not filled doesn't mean the others weren't. Please look again.

                Also your claim that the territory of Serbia was violated doesn't wash since Kosovo remains a part of Serbia and everyone there carries a Serbian & Montenagro passport. It remains what it was prior to 1989; an autonomous part of Serbia.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #38
                  BTW a friend of mine is now serving there. It is interesting to hear about how Camp Bondsteel has changed and what is different in 2005 vs 2000 when I was there.
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Wait there would be other ways to justify the war under international law?

                    The reason that most people use that the war for Kosovo was justified under international law was that the UN retroactively approved of the action (which is also why the UN, while deciding on how to help build up Iraq wanted to absolutely avoid any mention of approving the war in the first place).

                    However that reason is flimsy, IMO, and I guess to others.

                    Also your claim that the territory of Serbia was violated doesn't wash


                    So NATO planes didn't violate Serbian airspace?

                    I agree with Kosovo, but there is no doubt that it violated international law. There are writings of humanitarian wars (intervention for humanitarian reasons), but they haven't been accepted by most scholars or countries (ie, too easily open for abuse).
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X