When the hawks were doves.

[pchang]

Can't we just nuke them all and then the rest of us can live in peace?

[Bereta_Eder]

Yes the "problem" (not really) is that you'd have to be amongst the first to be nuked

[Bereta_Eder]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Oerdin: What was your opinion of Clinton's decision to intervene in Kosovo?

A soldier isn't supposed to publicly express any political opinion.

[Dracon II]

It's hypocrisy, dammit.

Obviously Ming was fusing the words hypocrisy and democracy...

[Ming]

Originally posted by Dracon II

It's hypocrisy, dammit.

Obviously Ming was fusing the words hypocrisy and democracy...

Nahhhh... not that smart... just bad spelling

[DaShi]

Re: Re: When the hawks were doves.

Originally posted by Ming


As clear as the hypocracy on the left

Face it... in politics, hypocracy can be found in both parties... but if you want to troll, feel free

Let me get this clear, you're saying that because you believe that the left are hypocrits, it's ok for the right to be as well?

[Ming]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA....

I NEVER said it was right for anybody... I was laughing at somebody who is "trying" to paint a single side in that light... trying to make one party seem worse than the other... Both sides are equally as bad. And claiming that EITHER party does it isn't really that bold of a statement.

[DaShi]

Both sides are equally bad? How? I look at America today, and America under Clinton just a few years ago, and guess which one looks better. This is despite the attempts by the right to utterly destroy Clinton for no good reason other than partisan politics.

[Theben]

Yeah, anyone in politics is/has been a hypocrite at some point. But this administration has elevated it past an art form to a new religion.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Datajack Franit
I don´t like Democrates complaining about Iraq when it´s all Clinton´s fault for turning the Balkans into a third-world subcontinent

You clearly know jack cheese about the history of the Balkans, why Yugoslavia broke apart, or what a third world country is like.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Ming
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA....

I NEVER said it was right for anybody... I was laughing at somebody who is "trying" to paint a single side in that light... trying to make one party seem worse than the other... Both sides are equally as bad. And claiming that EITHER party does it isn't really that bold of a statement.

Though neither party is perfect both sides most certainly are not equally bad and one side is worse then the other as a general rule. One side currently dominates all branches of the government so it's more of a worry then the side which hardly has influence over the government. Isn't it?

I contend having a split government is best since that way the two parties can keep each other honest, however, if one party is going to dominate the other then I know which one I'd prefer.

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Ming
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA....

I NEVER said it was right for anybody... I was laughing at somebody who is "trying" to paint a single side in that light... trying to make one party seem worse than the other... Both sides are equally as bad. And claiming that EITHER party does it isn't really that bold of a statement.

While your theory does make sense, what it doesn't take into account is the degree of suckage.

We SHOULD all be able to agree that this Administration sucks to such an exaggerated degree that has not been seen in nearly 80 years. If I had to coach someone on how to suck, I would use this one as a model. This is something we have not seen before, so your "business as usual" theory just doesn't fly this time.

In the historical annals of suckage, it is clear that Bush will be mentioned among Hoover, Harding, and Nixon.

Perhaps we can revisit Mt. Rushmore, and create its counterpart, Mt. Suckmore.

[Mr. Harley]

Ming - I have only two things to point out. "Compassionate Conservatism" and the new bankrupty law. I sincerely hope you have no friends who end up bankrupt due to being called to active duty (and having their personal business tank), bankrupt due to crippling medical costs (and you know why that's a hot button for me), bankrupt due to Identity theft (happens when a person's credit gets locked up and they go under before they can repair all the damage), or bankrupt due to divorce.

That's an awfully broad set of categories of peopel to be held in "wage peonage" for five plus years. Want to match hypocrisy for hypocrisy (Kid corrected my spelling ) Democrats versus Republicans? I think this administration will go down as the worst since Harding's, or maybe even Grant's, when it comes to corruption. Do you notice a trend in these three administrations?

[Dinner]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Oerdin: What was your opinion of Clinton's decision to intervene in Kosovo?

That was justified due to on going ethnic cleansing. Saddam was a brutal dictator but trying to justify invasion saying he gased people in 1987 is a bit different then on going ethnic cleansing. It is even weaker to claim Saddam would some how give WMD to Islamic Fundimentalists who he had spent 30 years executing or imprisoning.

[Sikander]

Originally posted by shawnmmcc
Ming - I have only two things to point out. "Compassionate Conservatism" and the new bankrupty law. I sincerely hope you have no friends who end up bankrupt due to being called to active duty (and having their personal business tank), bankrupt due to crippling medical costs (and you know why that's a hot button for me), bankrupt due to Identity theft (happens when a person's credit gets locked up and they go under before they can repair all the damage), or bankrupt due to divorce.

That's an awfully broad set of categories of peopel to be held in "wage peonage" for five plus years. Want to match hypocrisy for hypocrisy (Kid corrected my spelling ) Democrats versus Republicans? I think this administration will go down as the worst since Harding's, or maybe even Grant's, when it comes to corruption. Do you notice a trend in these three administrations?

I haven't seen evidence such of high levels of corruption in the executive branch that a comparison to either Grant or Harding is warranted. Stupidity, waste and reckless spending on the other hand....