Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
Why do you think people aren't considering that? Of course they are. Some will leave, because they can't take it any more. Most will stay, because a psychological attachment to home is more important than the losses they sustained. But everyone will consider it. They may not come to decisions you would agree with, but their decisions will be considered ones.
I remember during the Mississippi flood of 1993, people who had f*ck-all to begin with, and lost even that, moved right back to the floodplain when the waters receded. Why? Because there families had lived on that land for generations. I've never had that kind of sentimental attachment to place, but I can't say that it's not a considered reason to act as they did.
Why do you think people aren't considering that? Of course they are. Some will leave, because they can't take it any more. Most will stay, because a psychological attachment to home is more important than the losses they sustained. But everyone will consider it. They may not come to decisions you would agree with, but their decisions will be considered ones.
I remember during the Mississippi flood of 1993, people who had f*ck-all to begin with, and lost even that, moved right back to the floodplain when the waters receded. Why? Because there families had lived on that land for generations. I've never had that kind of sentimental attachment to place, but I can't say that it's not a considered reason to act as they did.
Comment