Armstrong: too good to be true?

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Sava
btw...

I've heard Lance Armstrong giving lots of denials...


saying its not true its not true its not true...

that's nice

but why doesn't he tell us WHY it's not true???

I'll wait for boris to post another weak defense from www.lancearmstrongsfanpage.com or some other site with no credibilty... LOL

Its sorta like

"sava beats women"

Now Sava, why don't you tell us why thats not true.



People rarely believe denials anyway and if Armstrong realy were clean ( lets assume for the moment he is and was) this crap is offensive.

If Armstron is/ was doping ( lets assume for the moment he was) then he doesn't want to get into sticky details. If dirty he knows he was dirty and probably just wants to wait out to see how much actual evidence there is.

[Sava]

well your analogy would be more correct if there were six women who had bruises who correctly identified me as the beater...

edit: with my DNA under their fingernails

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Sava
well your analogy would be more correct if there were six women who had bruises who correctly identified me as the beater...

edit: with my DNA under their fingernails

No -- the analogy would be some woman saying she was beaten repeatedly by you 6 years ago and she has photos of you togeteher and photos of her bruises and a statement from someone that hated you that they had an absolute link between you and the beatings

[boann]

Boris
i read the whole thread... agree with everything
you have to say. in fact can't think of anything else
to add to what you said already...


Sava don't you get therapy with your meds?
if you don't you should ck into that

[Hueij]

Funny. Two years ago no northern-american had a clue about professional cycling. And now they are all experts...

[rah]

I believe it was seven years ago that no one had a clue.

[Pyrodrew]

And Armstrong is not really an American, he's just a cyborg built by Americans to defeat the French.

[Kontiki]

Originally posted by Pyrodrew
And Armstrong is not really an American, he's just a cyborg built by Americans to defeat the French.

You mean beat the Germans. Then again, the French like it when the Germans come onto their soil and beat them.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Hueij
Funny. Two years ago no northern-american had a clue about professional cycling. And now they are all experts...

Definitely NOT an expert but I cycled and followed cycling before Armstrong and will continue after Armstrong. The big difference was the improved coverage over time

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Sava
I'll wait for boris to post another weak defense from www.lancearmstrongsfanpage.com or some other site with no credibilty... LOL

You mean how I've posted from multiple sources (like the AP), but the only single source you have to rely on is a sore loser French rag called Ve Hate Ze Armstrong, HONHONHON!

[DanS]

Originally posted by Hueij
Funny. Two years ago no northern-american had a clue about professional cycling. And now they are all experts...

It all started with LeMond and the 7-11 team, not Armstrong.

[Sava]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
sore loser French rag called Ve Hate Ze Armstrong, HONHONHON!

french people do suck

except spiffor

[Spiffor]

[Sava]

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Sava
btw...

I've heard Lance Armstrong giving lots of denials...


saying its not true its not true its not true...

that's nice

but why doesn't he tell us WHY it's not true???

I'll wait for boris to post another weak defense from www.lancearmstrongsfanpage.com or some other site with no credibilty... LOL

Armstrong was on Larry King Live-- you can call him a liar but you can't say he is avoiding the issue

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/25/lkl.01.html