Will the US lose the war in Iraq by running out of soldiers?

[GePap]

Originally posted by Oerdin
I love it! China continues commiting cultural genocide against Tibetians and has millions of jailed political prisoners but you folks think the US is worse because it has 200-500 jihadis who were caught red handed and were chucked in Gitmo.

The difference is that China has never once stated they are a beacon of freedom, has never invaded anyone claiming to stand for liberty, does not cliam itself to be the shinning beacon to the world and the state to be emulated in terms of rights and freedoms.

China acts like a evil bastard, and never claims to be anything else.

The US acts like an ******* but screams and rants about how come everyone doesn;t see them for the fine gentle princes they are.

honestly, whgich of those two personalities would you hate more?

[GePap]

Anyways, as for the first question.

No, the US won't run out of troops, thought it may run out of qualified officers and NCO's.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Agathon
Why wouldn't they?

They aren't monsters, despite what people say.

You mean, despite the fact that they send thousands back to their deaths in the DPRK.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove


Actually at that point in history Washington was little more that a few unfinished buildings, probably smaller than York. What the British really wanted were the shipping yards building the American super-frigates, but they were turned back at Baltimore. Oh say can you see?

And to see President Madison run like a little girl.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by GePap


The difference is that China has never once stated they are a beacon of freedom, has never invaded anyone claiming to stand for liberty, does not cliam itself to be the shinning beacon to the world and the state to be emulated in terms of rights and freedoms.

China acts like a evil bastard, and never claims to be anything else.

The US acts like an ******* but screams and rants about how come everyone doesn;t see them for the fine gentle princes they are.

honestly, whgich of those two personalities would you hate more?

The more evil one...

[Ted Striker]

Why the sudden favorable image of the US in India? Strange...

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Notice how the image of the US in Britain continues to plummet like a rock...

As does that of Blair.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


No it isn't.

Only if you think Canada and Britain are the only places that matter in the world.

[Kuciwalker]

This is KH.

[Ted Striker]

Well, Canada and the UK are considered to be the very closest allies the US has, so if they aren't supporting us, that is notable.

[notyoueither]

We might be subjected to more of the spleen that is vented by your own press, on top of our own.

We might also consider things like Gitmo to be more of an issue than some others do.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


It's within the combined margin of error in all but about 3 of them.

[notyoueither]

So you're saying that the positives mean nothing. Only the negatives.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker


The more evil one...

Yeah, right.

Normal people hate hypocrites more than evil bastards, as long as the evil bastard is not also a hypocrite.

[Kuciwalker]

Normal people are stupid.