Scientology - Your Opinion

[OzzyKP]

Re: Scientology - Your Opinion

Originally posted by Proteus_MST
As I had a discussion with some other people about scientology within another Forum, I came across the Fact, that Scientology in some countries outside of germany is either seen as harmless or even has the status of a religion (for example within the USA).
Whereas in germany it is considered as rather dangerous and either a sect or a concern, whis is under close observation by the government.

Hmm, Germany has a bad track record for outlawing religions in the past, you really sure the government should be checking up on these scientologists?


I say its a proto religion and should be left alone. The only difference between cults and religions is their popularity (and I say this as a religious person). Mormans were regarded the same way as scientologists just a few years ago (and still are sometimes), and heck so were Christians.

So if they want to believe something silly and waste their money on it, why not let them? I'm sure they think other religions believe something silly and waste their money on it.

Freedom of religion is meaningless if we can pick which beliefs should be allowed and which not.

[Barinthus]

Possible penalties if you disobey the church ...

                           HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                     Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

                       HCO Policy Letter of 18 October 1967,
                                     Issue IV
   Remimeo

                          PENALTIES FOR LOWER CONDITIONS

                          (Applies both Orgs and Sea Org)


LIABILITY  Suspension of pay and a dirty grey rag on left arm and day
           and night confinement to org premises.

TREASON    Suspension of pay and deprivation of all uniforms and insignia,
           a black mark on left cheek and confinement on org premises or
           dismissal from post and debarment from premises.

DOUBT      Debarment from premises. Not to be employed. Payment of fine
           amounting to any sum may have cost org. Not to be trained or
           processed. Not to be communicated or argue with.

ENEMY      SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by
           any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the
           Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.


LRH:jp                                                   L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (c) 1967                                       Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
a religion

Read any of the info on Clambake?

[Elok]

The Mormons had many questionable practices in the past, but for all I know they've mellowed out and behaved of late. The Scientologists, on the other hand, are pretty much proven to use mind-control techniques; "brainwashing" as it's usually thought of doesn't work, but they use the realistic equivalents, similar to those employed by totalitarian states. They censor and regulate the information their members receive, treat them as pariahs if they question the system in any way, and as Boann said, they charge a ridiculous and rapidly increasing amount of money for their services. Anything that charges set fees to members for advancement into the "faith" can't be a religion. Donations and honorariums to keep the organization of the ground are one thing. Scientology is a classic-style scam hiding behind the name of religion. Even if you believe that of all religions you have to admit that L. Ron Hubbard wins the prize for pure audacity.

[DanS]

Religious sect that should be left alone and able to do what it wants, within the law.

[Barinthus]

Even a religion that calls for 'destroying' its disloyal members?

[DanS]

Is it against the law? Look, I might speak out against them and my actions may be directly against Scientology's interests, but they have just as much right under the law to their religion as I do to mine.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Read any of the info on Clambake?

Sure did, long before this thread.

I don't see what differentiates it from other religions all that much...?

[Proteus_MST]

Re: Re: Scientology - Your Opinion

Originally posted by OzzyKP



Hmm, Germany has a bad track record for outlawing religions in the past, you really sure the government should be checking up on these scientologists?

Depends on which time you think.
If you think of the third Reich (where certain religions were persecuted), than it´s definitely no comparison to the germany of today.
As for today, I don´t know of any religion really outlawed.
Maybe Baghwan was outlawed during the 80s but Im not sure about it.
What we´ve got is definitely some religions which count as sects and therefore were under observation from the government. For example hare Krishna.

Originally posted by OzzyKP

I say its a proto religion and should be left alone. The only difference between cults and religions is their popularity (and I say this as a religious person). Mormans were regarded the same way as scientologists just a few years ago (and still are sometimes), and heck so were Christians.

So if they want to believe something silly and waste their money on it, why not let them? I'm sure they think other religions believe something silly and waste their money on it.

Freedom of religion is meaningless if we can pick which beliefs should be allowed and which not.

The Problem is not that they "just" grab the money of their members,
but that there are several reports of scientology trying to blackmail their former members and critics (often enough it are former member s which are the harshest critics of scientology).

Those people (critics and persons who broke with scientology and other people which scientology sees as dangerous) are called "suppressive persons".
And L. Ron Hubbard has made rules about dealing with these persons saying that suppressive persons are fair game and that scientology members aren´t allowed to have contact to said suppresssive persons but that all means are allowed to destroy these suppressive persons (themselves or their image in public).

For former scientology members this seems to be easy, as they are forced to regularly have some sessions where with the help of a lie detector some higher level scientology member tries to get to get hold of all inner secrets the person might have and (of course) writes all of them down for further use by scientology.

So they seem somehow more dangerous to society than just by making all of their members financially poorer.

This thread contains 2 interesting links which you should follow for further reading (and there are lots of other pages aside from those two dealing with scientology)

[Provost Harrison]

Why do people fall for this stupidity? And it applies to any religion...so weak...

[Jon Miller]

if people in it do illegal things.. then they shuold be charged for them

and if the organisation is prone to illegal activities.. then it should be heavily watched..

JM

[Jon Miller]

btw.. I think it likely that a lot of that group should go to jail on criminal charges..

which might cause the end of the group, which I THink would be beneficial

JM

[rah]

Hmm, I remember reading that in previous historical periods that you could pay to become a bishop or cardinal in the Catholic church, so is this anything really new to religion?

[Japher]

You still pay in the mormon church...

Too bad Tass ain't around to confirm this

Scientology doesn't come knocking on my door handing out fliers and telling me I'm going to hell without doing my laundry... So, I like them better than some.

They also don't complain about Jim Crow laws or racism or well, really anything.

[OzzyKP]

I agree with DanS. If members break the law, then prosecute them for that. If they aren't breaking the law, then leave them alone.