Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Save PBS from Right-Wing!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Save PBS from Right-Wing!

    PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY June 14, 2005

    The New CPB: Conservative Propaganda for Bush

    Elmo and Big Bird might soon be homeless if the right wing's latest base-rousing political ploy goes unchecked.

    Last week, the House Appropriations Subcommittee voted to slash the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's budget for next year by $100 million and eliminated another $23 million used to pay for shows such as "Sesame Street." (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/10/ar...ision/10pbs... ?) To make matters worse, the subcommittee also voted to entirely eliminate federal funding for the CPB -- the government agency that dispenses public funds for PBS stations across the nation -- within two years.

    This is simply the latest attempt by politicians to eliminate public broadcasting as an independent voice; one not controlled by far-right pundits or corporate owners. The American people have defeated such attacks before, but the right wing's grip on power in Washington, D.C. is stronger now -- it will take a powerful outcry from the American public to save the independent voice of public broadcasting.

    Send a letter to Rep. Lynch right away:


    This administration signaled its campaign to undermine PBS's independence in 2003, when President Bush named Kenneth Tomlinson, a close friend of Karl Rove, to the chairmanship of the CPB's Board of Directors. An avowed fan of FoxNews' "The O'Reilly Factor," Tomlinson has recently attacked PBS for an allegedly liberal bias and signaled steps to make the institution more Republican friendly.

    Claiming to have concerns about the "objectivity and balance" of the CPB and PBS, Tomlinson has taken a series of steps to ensure that their programming better reflects the Republican mandate. He has

    - Created programs to showcase conservative views such as "Tucker Carlson Unfiltered" and "The Journal Editorial Report."

    - Hired a White House staffer to draft guidelines for a new PBS ombudsman to monitor programs for bias.

    - Filled the ombudsman positions with one conservative and one "liberal" who endorsed Bush's former Office of Management and Budget director Mitch Daniels in his run for governor of Indiana.

    - Replaced the CPB's chief executive officer with a top Republican advisor to former chairman of the FCC, Michael Powell.

    And now, Tomlinson is pushing for the appointment of Patricia Harrison, a former co-chair of the Republican National Committee, to serve as the board's next president. So much for political independence!

    Public broadcasting icon Bill Moyers calls Tomlinson's crusade to remake PBS a "contemporary example of the age-old ambition of power and ideology to squelch and punish journalists who tell the stories that make princes and priests uncomfortable."

    That's speaking truth to power. Now it's your turn. Please contact your Representative now. Rep {name} will be voting on the proposed abolition of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting soon and you need to get the message across that supporting these draconian cuts will not go unpunished. Click here to send that message now. It's worth the minute it will take.

    Having fought for nearly a quarter century against efforts to intimidate and suppress sources of fact and dialogue, "People For" has helped defeat previous attacks on public broadcasting. But the latest threats have more teeth. So must our response.

    Contact your U.S. Rep. NOW! Then pass it on, and on, and on...
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

  • #2
    The partisan attack on public broadcasting continues. First, they targeted PBS and NPR news programs for signs of "liberal bias." Now they're sharpening their knives for Big Bird.

    A congressional subcommittee has voted to slash more than $200 million in funding for public broadcasting, including $23.4 million earmarked for "Ready to Learn" children's educational programming -- the money that keeps shows like "Sesame Street," "Arthur," and "Clifford the Big Red Dog" on the air.

    Thousands of phone calls are needed today to save public broadcasting. Call your member of Congress now. (Find their contact information at Go to www.freepress.net/act/savepbs .)

    The subcommittee slashed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's budget by $100 million and voted to "zero out" all federal money for CPB within two years. Small television and radio stations that serve rural communities and minority audiences will be devastated by these cuts.

    The CPB is already embroiled in controversy over Chairman Kenneth Tomlinson's attempts to withhold funding from PBS programs that don't follow his conservative political line. Apparently dissatisfied with this effort to make public broadcasting more "fair and balanced," the Republican majority is now trying to bankrupt the entire system.

    We must stop these cuts from passing in the House of Representatives. Here's what to do:

    1. Call your U.S.representative and ask him or her to restore full funding for public broadcasting. Tell your representative: "Like millions and millions of other Americans, I rely on public broadcasting's superb children's programming and trustworthy news and information. Please protect public broadcasting and restore full federal funding for PBS, NPR and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting."

    2. Send a letter to Reps. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) and Ralph Regula (R-Ohio), the chairman and vice chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, letting them know that the American public opposes these cuts and doesn't want partisan interference in public broadcasting. The letter is available at www.freepress.net/act/savepbs .

    Congress needs to hear from the tens of millions of Americans who tune in every day -- whether it's for Big Bird or Bill Moyers, "Reading Rainbow" or "Morning Edition." Despite overwhelming popular support for public broadcasting, the Republican leadership and partisan board members at the CPB are attempting to gag and starve public media in America.

    Don't let them. Call your representatives right away -- and forward this message to everyone you know.

    Onward,

    Timothy Karr
    Campaign Director
    What’s wrong with the media? Too slanted. Too greedy. Too much power in too few hands. It’s time to change that. The fight for better media begins here, so get involved today. Read more and share with your friends.


    P.S. To learn more about Free Press' campaign to put the public back in public broadcasting, visit our new Web site at http://www.freepress.net/publicbroadcasting .

    P.P.S. More than 85,000 concerned citizens have signed our petitions calling for CPB Chairman Kenneth Tomlinson to resign. Free Press will deliver the petitions on June 20, when the CPB's board of directors meets in Washington. Sign the petition now at http://www.freepress.net/action/pbs .
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      As a long-time watcher of PBS, I think Ken Tomlinson is doing precisely the right thing.
      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

      Comment


      • #4
        well soon there wont a PBS to watch anymore.
        "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

        Comment


        • #5
          I like PBS and I support it financially, however, given the government's bleeding-out magnitude deficits and the whole (long abandoned, I know, but still desirable) concept of "limited government" why should the Federal government fund PBS and CPB anyway?
          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm going to go hug the BBC.
            Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
            -Richard Dawkins

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
              I like PBS and I support it financially, however, given the government's bleeding-out magnitude deficits and the whole (long abandoned, I know, but still desirable) concept of "limited government" why should the Federal government fund PBS and CPB anyway?
              Even beyond government funding, the long term viability of public television is determined by it being seen as an honest player serving the broadest available audience, rather than as a mouthpiece for the "democratic wing of the democratic party." Tomlinson is right in pointing out this fact.
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
                I like PBS and I support it financially, however, given the government's bleeding-out magnitude deficits and the whole (long abandoned, I know, but still desirable) concept of "limited government" why should the Federal government fund PBS and CPB anyway?
                We will never balance the budget by eliminating tiny things like PBS nor by the popular Republican ploy of cutting education funds. We have to go after the mamoth dinosaurs of the budget like our half trillion dollar military budget (bigger then every single other nation on Earth combined; can you say excessive?) or the equally massive social services budget. Eliminating Bush's starwars program would save 20 times as much money per year as killing PBS and ending wastful farm subsidies which corrupt politicians use to buy votes would save far, far more.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It still has the best educational programming, and some of the best science programming, and for that alone deserves to be fully funded. It's a pittance on the budget, and a few Republicans should quit acting like crybabies...
                  "Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us." --MLK Jr.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DanS


                    Even beyond that, the long term viability of public television is determined by it being seen as an honest player, rather than a mouthpiece for the "democratic wing of the democratic party."
                    Except it isn't and you are a liar if you say it is. PBS actually has more conservative programs then liberal ones.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
                      I like PBS and I support it financially, however, given the government's bleeding-out magnitude deficits and the whole (long abandoned, I know, but still desirable) concept of "limited government" why should the Federal government fund PBS and CPB anyway?
                      Because it is the last, plaintive voice of reason in a mediascape of bias, irrationality and stupidity?

                      If that's not a reason, then God help us.
                      Only feebs vote.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Except it isn't and you are a liar if you say it is. PBS actually has more conservative programs then liberal ones.
                        I doubt you watch much public TV if you believe that there are more conservative programs than liberal ones.

                        Speaking of liars, you aren't credible when you quote People for the American Way.
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I watch a great deal of PBS. In fact it is one of the only stations besides the various news channels and the history channel which I watch on a regular basis. PBS has numerous conservative shows and it has created two more in the last year to try to keep Republicans whiners happy. Hell, Republican **** bags even installed a fellow from FOX NEWS (!!!) onto PBS's board and there has been a panel, filled mostly with right wingers, who's sole job is to monitor PBS programing for bias. So far they haven't found anything meaningful.

                          You're claims that PBS is some sort of raving left wing network come from ignorance and ideological hate instead of facts and reasoned opinion.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Here's tonight's lineup for my public TV channel...

                            Newshour (non-partisan)
                            NOVA (non-partisan)
                            Clear the Skies (non-partisan)
                            Frontline (sometimes center-right, sometimes center-left)
                            Charlie Rose (left, but tolerable)
                            Tavis Smiley (left)
                            Nightly Business Report (non-partisan)
                            In the Life (far-left)

                            Realize that this schedule makes it tough to support the station, whether through the congress or through private donations.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              People For the American Way is a national progressive advocacy organization fighting for freedom, justice, and democracy.


                              Please sign the petition to save PBS from the partisan attacks of the Republican party.
                              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X