MarkG = Palpatine, Ming = Annakin? Laser sword = banning rod? But who's Theoden here......
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Star Wars vs Lord of the Rings - thoughts about Theoden and Palpatine
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GePap
I disagree.
Tolkien's main experience with modern technological war was WW1. Did Tolkien himself ever say much about WW2 or any influence it might have had on his tales?
Lucas created Palpatine in the late 1970's, so the whole errosion of civil rights in the late 70's does not make much sense.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GePap
I disagree.
Tolkien's main experience with modern technological war was WW1. Did Tolkien himself ever say much about WW2 or any influence it might have had on his tales?
Lucas created Palpatine in the late 1970's, so the whole errosion of civil rights in the late 70's does not make much sense."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
Re: just a sidenote
Originally posted by oedo
Not exactly. Palpatine's soul survived his death. There are still three more Episodes to come.
Boba Fett survived as well, BTW.
As far as Lucas is concerned, both Palpatine and Boba Fett died in their respective movie demises. And since Lucas has already said he won't do any more SW movies, that's his final word on the matter.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
Tolkien was never a huge fan of straight allegory. One can hunt through LotR for symbols and maybe even subconscious associations, but exact parallels to contemporary events would be forced and fallacious. As pointed out above, Tolkien was writing based on Anglo-Saxon and various Nordic traditions largely composed in pre-Norman England. Lord of the Rings was to be the national myth he felt England never had, not a warning of the times.Visit The Frontier for all your geopolitical, historical, sci-fi, and fantasy forum gaming needs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DerSchwarzfalke
Tolkien was never a huge fan of straight allegory. One can hunt through LotR for symbols and maybe even subconscious associations, but exact parallels to contemporary events would be forced and fallacious. As pointed out above, Tolkien was writing based on Anglo-Saxon and various Nordic traditions largely composed in pre-Norman England. Lord of the Rings was to be the national myth he felt England never had, not a warning of the times."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
that's his final word on the matter.
Pleaaaaasse let it be true.Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment
-
Originally posted by DerSchwarzfalke
Tolkien was never a huge fan of straight allegory. One can hunt through LotR for symbols and maybe even subconscious associations, but exact parallels to contemporary events would be forced and fallacious. As pointed out above, Tolkien was writing based on Anglo-Saxon and various Nordic traditions largely composed in pre-Norman England. Lord of the Rings was to be the national myth he felt England never had, not a warning of the times."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by oedo
Lando will realize an old childhood dream and will moderate the "Other Games" forum at Apolyton. He'll never make it to the HOF, though.Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: just a sidenote
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
It is, though.
In fact, there is so much contradictory stuff in the EU that considering any of it canon is silly. Until Lucas puts it on film, it ain't canon, simple as that.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: Re: just a sidenote
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
No it isn't. At least, not by a majority. Those who think the Zahn novels are the true successors to the movies would scoff at the notion that Dark Empire is in any way legitimate (esp. since they are contradictory).
In fact, there is so much contradictory stuff in the EU that considering any of it canon is silly. Until Lucas puts it on film, it ain't canon, simple as that."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment