Why isn't there more talk of the smoking gun memo?

[Dauphin]

Fixed and forged are different things in the context. Forging requires deliberate actions of creating false evidence, fixing requires ignoring things you don't like in order to paint the picture you want.

[Alexander's Horse]

Originally posted by Dauphin
What's the chances of the Liberal Left Communist Conspirator Media (i.e FOX) not mentioning that there are troops in Iraq and hoping Joe Public forgets that they haven't been brought home?

I seriously thought they might do that - pretend the war was over - Fox has got pretty close to doing that a couple of times - when Bush claimed mission accomplished and immediately after the election when there was a bit of a lull.

Let's not forget the 10,000 US troops wounded, many surviving in spite of horrific wounds thanks to body armour.

Oh yeah we forgot them from day one

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Agathon


No. It stated it was being fixed.

Kudos to you. Reading is a plus. Next week maybe you can translate that tome of knowledge named "My Pet Goat" for us.

Fixed implies any number of connotations. In my estimation it speaks primarily to the sad state of intelligence all were feeling circa 2001/2002 and how that intelligence gap was being FIXED.

It must be terrible to be a hair's breadth from complete humiliation on this matter, as you and your side are Ogie.

You need a better score card/program, one that has the team members rightly defined before you continue with your ohh so typical open mouth insert both feet routine I come to expect from you.

Point of the matter is I was against resuming hositilities in Iraq and said so in these forums. I further stated that if and when the US did engage in hositlites if no WMD's were found there would be hell to pay. I felt the attempts to use WMD as a causus belli were a transparent ploy. I felt the die was cast early on and that the going to to the UN for coalition building was a mere ploy to enlist additional aid and moreover to placate and give cover to the Brits. What I am fuzzy on is the time frame that W made the unbreakable decision in his mind that military action was going to take place. Certainly the military planning and advisors were preparing, but who actually knows what was going (if anything according to the likes of you and yours ) on and more to the point when in W's head.

All that being said, I also said they had no need for trumping up such a case as the continual material breaches of UN resolutions were all that were required for action. (An action by the way that I for the record was against doing).

Finally, once the decision was made, I do feel it important for all parties to bring a peaceful resolution as soon as possible. So quelling insurgencies and bringing peaceful self rule to Iraq are something that I support and will continue to do. If that puts me on a particular team, perhaps you would be so kind as to tell me which one it is as then I can pass the ball off to the appropriate wide receiver. Last time I checked my posts were written by me and not Joe Postpattern.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Dauphin
Fixed and forged are different things in the context. Forging requires deliberate actions of creating false evidence, fixing requires ignoring things you don't like in order to paint the picture you want.

Agreed which is why I want a link to the second memo to understand further the context of FIXED.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe

Kudos to you. Reading is a plus. Next week maybe you can translate that tome of knowledge named "My Pet Goat" for us.

Nice try... perhaps you could come up with something wittier, although I doubt it.

Fixed implies any number of connotations. In my estimation it speaks primarily to the sad state of intelligence all were feeling circa 2001/2002 and how that intelligence gap was being FIXED.

No.

"fixed around" means to any reasonably competent English speaker that the policy was dictating the facts rather than the other way around.

As for any other interpretation... sorry, that dog don't hunt.

You need a better score card/program, one that has the team members rightly defined before you continue with your ohh so typical open mouth insert both feet routine I come to expect from you.

Point of the matter is I was against resuming hositilities in Iraq and said so in these forums. I further stated that if and when the US did engage in hositlites if no WMD's were found there would be hell to pay. I felt the attempts to use WMD as a causus belli were a transparent ploy. I felt the die was cast early on and that the going to to the UN for coalition building was a mere ploy to enlist additional aid and moreover to placate and give cover to the Brits. What I am fuzzy on is the time frame that W made the unbreakable decision in his mind that military action was going to take place. Certainly the military planning and advisors were preparing, but who actually knows what was going (if anything according to the likes of you and yours ) on and more to the point when in W's head.

All that being said, I also said they had no need for trumping up such a case as the continual material breaches of UN resolutions were all that were required for action. (An action by the way that I for the record was against doing).

Finally, once the decision was made, I do feel it important for all parties to bring a peaceful resolution as soon as possible. So quelling insurgencies and bringing peaceful self rule to Iraq are something that I support and will continue to do. If that puts me on a particular team, perhaps you would be so kind as to tell me which one it is as then I can pass the ball off to the appropriate wide receiver. Last time I checked my posts were written by me and not Joe Postpattern.

Sorry, I mistook you for some other evil fascist pig. You all look and sound the same to me, so you'll forgive me my honest mistake, I hope.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Originally posted by Agathon

No.

"fixed around" means to any reasonably competent English speaker that the policy was dictating the facts rather than the other way around.

As for any other interpretation... sorry, that dog don't hunt.

Considering it was a poorly crafted sentence the assumption that it is a competant English speaker is a faulty one. That being said context is everything and the overriding concerns of the day in that time frame were our absolutely horrid intelligence failures of 9/11 and elsewhere.

It is absolutely reasonable to expect the lack of intelligence was what was being referred to and that the siutuation was being fixed around Iraq in particular.

Good Dog. Bang!

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


Considering it was a poorly crafted sentence the assumption that it is a competant English speaker is a faulty one. That being said context is everything and the overriding concerns of the day in that time frame were our absolutely horrid intelligence failures of 9/11 and elsewhere.

It is absolutely reasonable to expect the lack of intelligence was what was being referred to and that the siutuation was being fixed around Iraq in particular.

Good Dog. Bang!

I find your interpretation to be a crime against the English language. That's not what it says. I realize that you Yanks have a problem with spelling and stuff, but I didn't realize it had got quite this desperate.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


2nd memo link? 'cause the 1st one didn't state explicitly or implicily intelligence was being forged

That is so sad! Oggie is trying to deny th perfectly obvious and fully STATED facts from the memo.

[Dinner]

NBC News has verified the memos; please notice the use of plural so more memos have been uncovered. The British press is just working their asses off on this story where as ours is a bunch of lazy tossers who want to be spoon feed. NBC has put Andrea Mitchell on the story so this could be the main stream media break we've been waiting for:

More British memos on pre-Iraq war concerns
Officials deny intelligence that facts were fixed to invade Iraq
By Andrea Mitchell
Correspondent

WASHINGTON — It started during British Prime Minister Tony Blair's re-election campaign last month, when details leaked about a top-secret memo, written in July 2002 — eight months before the Iraq war. In the memo, British officials just back from Washington reported that prewar "intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" to invade Iraq.

Just last week, President Bush and Blair vigorously denied that war was inevitable.

“No, the facts were not being fixed, in any shape or form at all,” said Blair at a White House news conference with the president on June 7.

But now, war critics have come up with seven more memos, verified by NBC News.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8207731

[GePap]

I have to agree with Ogie here that when I read fixed I do not think "made up". I think much the same way Dauphin does- speak in half truths, not in full lies. Ignore the inconvinient and always trump the parts that back your arguement.

Like on the Aluminum tubes. Saddam did buy them. The way you "fix that" is to claim that any evidence they might have non-nuclear uses is obviously an Iraqi cover story because the ONLY possible use is in a nuclear program, DUH! and then just hope the press is too stupid or spineless never ever to question your questionable statements.

And, well, that is exactly what went on.

[Dinner]

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2005/06/14/worldviews.DTL

More news about the second Downing Street Memo from the San Francisco Chronicle.

[MichaeltheGreat]

Originally posted by Oerdin
I'm still a bit unclear how a clear family involement from a part of the world where family is everything isn't meaningful. Can you you please explain?

The sons followed the father's jihadist footsteps years later, one into al Qaeda and one just a routine Afghan-Arab. The fact that they're engaged in the family trade isn't the same as saying they all worked under the direction of the same organization going back to the father's original actions.

The sons' later actions don't create a backward link to the original action of the father. The father's actions predated by years the association between bin Laden and al Zawahiri, and there's no other evidence that connects EIJ with AQ back in 1992-93.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

How exactly? If you're saying I'm ignorant of Limbaugh's views on Kosovo (or Limbaugh's views in general), then I must admit to being guilty as charged.

:b

I guess its a good thing I never made that disingenuous comparison, then.

Yes you did, when you made a little "scorecared" of Bush Vs. Clinton when dealing with AQ.

Lets add of course that politically Clinton had little flexibility during both of the big AQ attacks. The embassy bombings occured just at the time he was in the process of being impeached or close to it. What little he did was called a distraction- no way could he had gotten more support at that point. BY the time the impeachement mess was done for, political will for big action was gone. Then the Cole attack happens less than a month beofre a presidential election with Clinton as a lame duck. Not much political will there, specially during the Florida mess. Bush came to office 4 months after the Cole attack- never heard a peep about taking military action to avenge that at that point.

I never said that. I believe I said pretty much the exact opposite...

See, this is why I don't even bother with you anymore.

Given your record of trying to disown previous posts, you are as credible as the bUsh admin.

[MichaeltheGreat]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

So, replace "Al Qaeda" with "Al Qaeda and its ideological and real world allies" in my previous post and the point stands.

So in other words, it's the Russian goverment under Putin who was responsible for the Stalinist purges, because we're going to attribute past actions of a different entity to the current successor entity, to justify an increased threat perception after the fact?

Until 9/11, we dismissed Islamic fundamentalists as wackos who couldn't do any real damage. They pull off a one-off operation because we had our heads up our collective asses, and now they're the uberenemy responsible for everything under the sun?

If you want a war against all Islamic fundamentalists, cool, but at least admit that's how you define it rather than expand the definition of al Qaeda to Orwellian proportions (are they Eurasia or Eastasia? )

[GePap]

Hmm,I wonder how one spins it to show that the reason the US media is not playing up the Downing Street memos proves they are a liberal cabal out to get Bush...

Some conservative out there must know, cause we ALL KNOW the media is made up of anti-Bush commies, and they could not possibly be ginoring such a nice "story", right??



While having the ability to say "I told you so" is sometimes sweet, its not when the results of being able to say "I told you so" are so crappy.