If Ken Lay was flayed alive on national television, do you think another CEO would try to cook the books for a few years? I don't.
I do.
But let's not forget it wasn't Ken Lay who cooked Enron's books. I'm sure, being the expert on it, you know who the true criminals were in the Enron story so I won't mention them here. But still... why the focus on Lay when it is a fact that he didn't do anything wrong except allow a permissive culture like that to exist in the first place?
And you'll have to explain to us why you think Sarbannes-Oxley isn't deterrent enough?
Again, I ask, how do you not plan to rape a child?
Comment