Pedophiles Can Go to HELL

[Gatekeeper]

Re: Re: Pedophiles Can Go to HELL

Originally posted by Dissident
why did you feel the need to say they were white men?

It's part of a sinister media conspiracy to stereotype all white males as pedophiles. *cough* Seriously, there was no particular reason; the information was included in the news copy I read, so that if it had been necessary for the public to keep an eye out for these particular individuals, there would have been a reference point or two.

Gatekeeper

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Kamrat X
I think the sexualisation of kids blurs the lines about paedophilia and what´s allowed and not. We have 12 year olds running around looking like hookers or something out of a rap video. Clothes stores are selling two piece bathing suits for 7 year olds and one chain (Lindex) actually tried to market sexy lingerie for pre-teens. I mean, how ****ed up ain´t that?

My 4 year-old daughter owns a bikini. She looks very nice in it.

As far as I can see, if you equate that with the decline of the world's morals, you are but a short step from insisting on placing trousers on table legs.

[Gatekeeper]

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Am I the only one who reads the American posts and often thinks - thank God we exported most of the nutjobs over there?

I imagine it's hard to accept for some folks, but less-than-stellar human behavior is just that — human. National borders aren't a barrier to it. Why, it wasn't too long ago that they busted a helluva huge child porn ring based in Europe, and then before that they busted one based in Texas. Proof that borders are no obstacle to human behaviors that aren't very admirable.

Gatekeeper

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

I think he was referring to the posters, not the criminals they were describing.

[Gatekeeper]

Originally posted by Agathon
Why don't we publicly boil them in oil GK?

Oh wait... that would be barbaric.

Nice one-liner, Agathon. I'll have to keep that in mind the next time you post a topic raving and ranting about something that's close to your heart. I'll make a point of stopping in there, offering a one-shot special, and then leave.

Gatekeeper

[Gatekeeper]

Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
I think he was referring to the posters, not the criminals they were describing.

Hmm. So does that make me, as the thread originator, a nutcase? If so, that's a bit frightening, for what does it mean for folks who are to the left and right of me in terms of politics, social views and whatnot?

Gatekeeper

[Dis]

Originally posted by Sikander


I had sex with a couple of 13 year old girls. Of course I was 13-14 myself then.

sure you did. . When I was that age, no girls were putting out.

[Gatekeeper]

Asleepathewheel:

The statistical information you provided is most enlightening — my only question is its age. I assume 1994 must be the latest year for which the government has complete information? (Knowing the glacial pace the feds move at, it wouldn't surprise me.)

Furthermore, it behooves me to clarify my opening post: I would apply my solution — banishment to an Arctic prison of some sort — only to repeat pedophiles. IOW, first-timers — although just as disgusting as their repeat brethren — would get a chance to prove themselves capable of rehabilitation. There wouldn't be any summary banishment for them.

There. Doesn't that sound like a nice, reasonable balance between those who subscribe to the rehabilitation-at-any-cost notion and those who prefer the punish-at-any-cost option? Yes? Unfortunately, in today's world, that means it'll likely never come to fruition.

Gatekeeper

[Last Conformist]

Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp


My 4 year-old daughter owns a bikini. She looks very nice in it.

The funny thing is that the alternative swimwear for little girls is whole-body swimming suits (whatever you call it in English); you never see little girls in the kind of swimming pants boys (and men) commonly use. For reasons good or bad, little girls exposing their chests isn't considered desirable. Can't see why bikinis are necessarily worse than suits.

I do see a problem, however, with bikinis and lingerie for little girls that intentionally mimics adult versions that are aggressively sexy.


(Oh, and yes, I've seen little girl swimming nude too. I think you'll agree this is something different again.)

[Alexander's Horse]

why are we even paying attention to what little kids are wearing?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Last Conformist

The funny thing is that the alternative swimwear for little girls is whole-body swimming suits (whatever you call it in English); you never see little girls in the kind of swimming pants boys (and men) commonly use. For reasons good or bad, little girls exposing their chests isn't considered desirable. Can't see why bikinis are necessarily worse than suits.

I do see a problem, however, with bikinis and lingerie for little girls that intentionally mimics adult versions that are aggressively sexy.


(Oh, and yes, I've seen little girl swimming nude too. I think you'll agree this is something different again.)

That's when she wasn't naked, of course.

[Jon Miller]

Originally posted by Dissident


sure you did. . When I was that age, no girls were putting out.

in some places they do

and some people do, generally ones that have other issues

Jon Miller
(but honestly? my sister was having sex with her boyfreind at that age)

(edit: talking about 14)

[Wycoff]

Originally posted by Jon Miller


in some places they do

and some people do, generally ones that have other issues

Jon Miller
(but honestly? my sister was having sex with her boyfreind at that age)

(edit: talking about 14)

whoa. Things started young around the Jon Miller house.

[Jon Miller]

and actually, come to think of it, the girlfreind of my best freind started having sex at that age also

JM

[Dr Strangelove]

Originally posted by Wycoff


whoa. Things started young around the Jon Miller house.

Must be somehwere near the Long Island Expressway.