Pedophiles Can Go to HELL

[Whoha]

Oh there is nothing wrong with someone getting a fair trial, but I'd like to think that there would be nothing unfair about evidence, however damning it may be.

[Alexander's Horse]

well there is evidence and evidence, some is admissible and some isn't. You have the same thing in the US.

[Whoha]

we have unlawfully obtained evidence, that is true. We don't have evidence that is "too damning" though.

[Alexander's Horse]

yes you do - evidence which is prejudicial to the defendent and may prevent the defendant getting a fair trial - that is what I think we're talking about in this case but I haven't looked it up yet

[Whoha]

I don't know about that:
"But in court, his defence team led by legal aid solicitor Joanne Harris successfully argued the evidence would unduly prejudice the jury.

A court source said: "The evidence would be too prejudicial for the jury to hear, they would naturaly assume from some of the evidence, that he was guilty."

from a different site
" But we must bear in mind that evidence which is prejudicial only in the sense that it incriminates the accused is not prejudicial for the purposes of the discretion."

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Bkeela
Why are the parents of these girls allowing them to roam about, vulnerable to abduction?

Maybe a more graphic rendition of Little Red Riding Hood could be used to educate kids?

Forced viewing of Freeway for all young children!

[Sikander]

Originally posted by asleepathewheel
if kids were allowed to carry guns, these things wouldn't be a problem.

What, you're children don't pack? Barbarous!

[Dis]

I love that movie . Reese is so hawt!

[Dis]

Child molesters should be sent to institutions and not prison as I've said before. And they should not be let free. Unless it can be proven they are better? How do we prove it? show them their favourite kind of porn (when they were sick) and if they get a stiffy, they aren't cured. .

I just don't think it's helpful to put child molesters in with the general prison population. And it certainly isn't helpful to let the roam the streets.

I think it all comes down to money. Most states do not have the mental health infrastructure to handle the large numbers of paedophiles.

edit: typo

[Sikander]

I agree with those who think we should seperate pedophilia from unlawful consensual sex with teenagers. It seems as though the justice system here does a pretty good job of screening and sorting the many people who run afoul of these laws these days. Given that there are quite a few types of people who wind up in trouble for violations of these laws it is no small thing.

Check out a couple of definitions from: http://www.umkc.edu/sites/hsw/issues/pedophil.html

Fixated (or exclusive type) pedophilia. The fixated pedophiles consider themselves to be trapped in childhood. They usually have minimum relations with adult peers, and relate better with children. They are identified mainly as men and their primary interest is in boys, with whom they develop boy to boy relationships. They typically plan their activities to promote access to young boys through church, neighborhood, or sporting activities.

Or in certain cases building a private amusement park and preying on the diseased children of dysfunctional parents.

Regressed (or nonexclusive type) pedophilia. On the other hand, the regressed pedophile is not ordinarily attracted to children. Those with regressed pedophilia are typically heterosexual married males and most likely to sexually molest 8 or 9 year old female children. Some pedophiles complain of anxiety or tension related to employment or marital relationship as precursors to pedophilic impulses, as well as alcohol or drug usage. They view the child as an adult substitute, and relate to the child in an adult to adult manner. The first sexual encounter is usually sudden and unplanned.

This type commonly manifests as incest. A similar sort of relationship (child substitute for an adult, sans sex) is quite common in dysfunctional families. It's really bad for the kid either way, but given the choice I'd rather have trouble with relationships than have trouble with relationships and trouble with sex.

The regressed type is considered very difficult to treat, and in part because of that they are typically sentenced for long terms, which reduces their ability to victimize others / screw up recidivism rates. The situational / regressed type is much more likely to respond to treatment and more often shown leniancy.

[Dis]

I believe most states do seperate teenager sex with padophilia. They have separate laws for sex for those under age 14. And no one should have any business having sex with 13 year olds.

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Dissident
I believe most states do seperate teenager sex with padophilia. They have separate laws for sex for those under age 14. And no one should have any business having sex with 13 year olds.

I had sex with a couple of 13 year old girls. Of course I was 13-14 myself then.

[MRT144]

Originally posted by Sikander


I had sex with a couple of 13 year old girls. Of course I was 13-14 myself then.

youre a pimp!

[Odin]

Low-level sex offenders should be put under house arrest after thier sentence and time in a mental institution. Mid-level offenders would be sent to fenced off "prison towns" that the offenders would not be allowed to leave after prison time and treatment. High level ofenders would be sent to a mental istitution for the rest of thier life after imprsonment.

[Atahualpa]

Pedophiles Can Go to HELL

What if the devil is a child?