Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vhat Booke Arrr Ye Reedin'?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    The "Hitchhikers guide" series and the "Dirk Gently" got me through my lonely junior high school days with everything intact. Certainly saved my sense of humour.
    David Eddings and Raymond E. Feist were big pluses then too.

    Nowadays I tend to read several books at a time quite intermittently. I've been enjoying Philip K. Dick. "The Simulacra" is just weird, "The Man in the High Castle" is interesting, and "VALIS" is as insane as the author was at the time, no doubt.

    Haven't got around to finishing "The Myth of Sisyphus" by Camus, or "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers" by Paul Kennedy yet... because I have to do a lot of reading for uni... but I will.

    Foucault's pendulum sounds quite fascinating.. might give it a shot. Does it's title refer to a use of Foucault in the book or just Eco's friendship with him? I imagine it would have been reading around or after his death.

    Comment


    • #92
      Electromagnetic Fields, Energy and Waves.



      And that new Churchill book by some guy whose name I cant remember. Best something.
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by alva


        Say, have you ever gotten around to reading "Journey to the end of night" by Celine? A long while ago you said you were going too, so.

        I read that ages ago, my little moule. You have me confused with somebody else.

        Also read 'Death on the Instalment Plan' by the charming chap too.
        Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

        ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

        Comment


        • #94
          I guess I did then. Not sure about being your little moule though, my big cod..
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
          Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by alva
            I guess I did then. Not sure about being your little moule though, my big cod..

            Je vous prie de me pardonner.


            Indeed you are a very whelk.


            Happy Paques, by the by, alva. Eat some choccies for me.
            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

            Comment


            • #96
              Nothing to excuse, you coquilles st-Jacques you. (I'll be ending this now btw... )

              and I'm not a big chocy eater. You never really appreciate what you can have, do you.
              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
              Then why call him God? - Epicurus

              Comment


              • #97
                I just finished "Another Roadside Attraction" by Tom Robbins

                Ah, thanks for mentioning Tom Robbins Time to read Cowgirl again.
                Within weeks they'll be re-opening the shipyards
                And notifying the next of kin
                Once again...

                Comment


                • #98
                  Foucault's pendulum sounds quite fascinating.. might give it a shot. Does it's title refer to a use of Foucault in the book or just Eco's friendship with him? I imagine it would have been reading around or after his death.
                  It has nothing to do with Michel Foucault. It refers to Léon Foucault's pendulum. You can see the pendulum at the Panthéon in Paris. I've seen it and its pretty impressive. For your culture:

                  Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by nostromo


                    It has nothing to do with Michel Foucault. It refers to Léon Foucault's pendulum. You can see the pendulum at the Panthéon in Paris. I've seen it and its pretty impressive. For your culture:

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%E9on_Foucault
                    Thanks for getting to the answer of that question.


                    Basically I see Foucault's Pendulum has the older and better version of The Da Vinci Code from everything I've heard, especially based off of what my teacher had to say.
                    However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

                    Comment


                    • Basically I see Foucault's Pendulum has the older and better version of The Da Vinci Code from everything I've heard, especially based off of what my teacher had to say.
                      I've read a recent interview with Eco. According to Eco, the difference between him and Brown is that Brown takes this stuff seriously. While Foucault's pendulum is meant as a criticism of the occult and conspiracy theories. It seems that in Italy, after the 70s, communist or left-wing bookshops gradually became occult bookshops...
                      Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

                      Comment


                      • It seems that in Italy, after the 70s, communist or left-wing bookshops gradually became occult bookshops...


                        From one pseudoscience to another, eh?

                        Comment


                        • Bookes

                          Brooke Burke
                          We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                          Comment


                          • Bookes

                            Brooke Burke

                            Brooke Burke endorsing Burger King

                            Comment


                            • From one pseudoscience to another, eh?
                              Yep, but Marx is a lot more interesting than John Edwards, who is the greatest douchebag of the universe. The worse part is that a friend of mine is translating Edwards in french.
                              Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

                              Comment


                              • I picked up The Time Machine yesterday, I expect to start reading it in a couple days.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X