Originally posted by beingofone

I've been accused by some people (ignorant of particular aspects of my areas of knowledge) of being able only to post large chunks of googled texts.
Of course, when one is attempting to develop an argument that may have contentious ideas or pieces of information not generally available, one has to either provide additional supporting information, or what would in another sense be footnotes or attributions.
If you have particular information pertinent to an argument of yours, then in poker terminology, let's see your hand.
Otherwise, you're a busted flush.
Comment