New Scenario: "Atomic Eagle"

[Harry Tuttle]

Update:

Terrain 1 & 2- 80%
Units - 50%
Map - 100%
Events - 70%
Icons - 60%
Cities - 0%

It's a comin'!

[Harry Tuttle]

ScreenShot!

A little something to wet your palette. A group of American fighters try to fend off an attack on a petroleum field by some advanced Nazi bombers and fighters!

[jim panse]

look good, Harry *pookseyesout*

[Harry Tuttle]

New Graphic Nuance

Well, I was working on finishing the terrain, which is now 99% finished, and I thought of something. A good scenario not only should have great gameplay, but great graphics too.

Now, I know what your saying: "Duh Harry, could've told you that one", but think about it. How many scenarios out there truly take advantage of Civ 2's graphic overlay when applying terrain? Have you ever built a fortress over a mine, which is over some sort of resource? Can't quite see all three very clearly, can you?

So many designers try to cram all these nice looking graphics into their scenarios, but then have them get blurred as players build up their territory. My solution: Terrain Modules. By simply designing the terrain to seamlessly integrate any scenario can can have top notch terrain that the player can both see, appreciate, and understand without having to resort to identifying the different layers with the cursor.

Just a little something I've done with my terrain. Hope you like it.

[Palaiologos]

Duh Harry, could've told you that one.

[Palaiologos]

But seriously now, i am afraid i haven't clearly understood that terrain module thing.

I hope you don't mean that you will make terrain graphics simpler and cruder and thus better identifiable.

[Harry Tuttle]

Not simpler really. It's all about strategic placement of your graphics. You can pretty much do this with any kind of graphic, hi-res, Nemo-esque, you name it.

Picture this: Let's say you've replaced the normal Civ2 "buffalo" resource with a custom resource called "oil fields" and the "mine" improvement with "factory". The "oil fields" consist of a a few derricks on the left of the diamond and a oil tank on the right. The "factory" improvement consists of a building with some smokestacks. The oil field looks nice by itself, but when a settler puts a "factory" on the oil field diamond you suddenly have a factory overlapping the oil derricks and the oil tank, creating a terrain diamond that is not all that realistic looking or aesthetically pleasing. Plus, the "factory" may hide the fact that the diamond has a valuable resource underneath it.

The solution? Map out beforehand how the different graphics will look when they are grouped on the same terrain diamond. Instead of having the "factory" appear smack in the middle of the diamond why not place it off to the side where the oil tank is located? When the oil field is mined the "factory" graphic will overlap the tank, creating the look of a orderly, bustling industrial area. Both the resource and the mine graphic are clearly represented, plus you have just created a schnazzy little piece of eye candy for your scenario.

You can even add another addition to this mix. Let's say you want to protect this valuable piece of property from your enemies, so you build the "fortress" improvement on the terrain diamond. Since you thought ahead, the fortress seemlessly overlaps part of the diamond, replacing some grassy area from the "oil field" and a parking lot from the "factory" without compromising the objects represented on the diamond. A few sandbags next to a derrick, a fence next to the factory and suddenly you have a cool looking fortified industrial area.

The only trick is that you have to figure out how exactly universal improvements like your mine and fortress will overlap all the terrains that you can posibly build them upon.

Bottom line: More eye-candy, easier terrain recognition, and it just looks cool.

Other ideas: For a "Vineyard"-like scenario - A "fruit orchard" terrain square containing rows of fruit trees. The mine improvement could be changed to a bunch of workers with ladders and baskets. When the improvement is built on the diamond the result would look like the orchard is being harvested and men are actually climbing up to pick the trees. In essence the new graphic would look like there is action in the orchard instead of there just being a bunch of trees.

Neat huh?

[Palaiologos]

Oh..

I see.

That is a rather splendid idea actually.

good job!

[Harry Tuttle]

A quick illustration from some terrain that's already been posted.

Please excuse the discoloration. I'm working without PSP for the time being so my new gifs are being a pain.

[Jimmywax]

An excellent idea, but doesn't the terrain underneath now become invisible?

[Harry Tuttle]

Well no, the terrain would be the oil field in the picture, and the factory would be the improvement. The way the graphics are set up in Civ2 the factory is layered on top of the oil field. Nothing is being made invisible per say, only layered upon. The pink part in the factory tile is of course the see through color used throughout the units, and terrain images. You just gotta make sure you don't cover up anything that is vital to identifying a terrain square.

[Harry Tuttle]

Ok, after realizing that an irrigated oil field would look odd, I'm moving the oil fields to the glacier spot. That should take care of any graphic problems

[Jimmywax]

My bad, I thought the oil feild was an improvement as well.

[Harry Tuttle]

Terrain: Done, completely. It looks pretty, really.
City Placement: 95%

Does anyone know of a good, and free, sound editor? I'm going to start working on the briefings this week.

Would anyone like to propose some shields for the units? Something new and interesting?

PM me if you'd like to contribute...

[Harry Tuttle]

Next Question: Should I mess with the railroads in the scenario and turn them into something that might be more fun than transportation? I could turn the railroads into suburbs, little towns. It's just something that might fill in the spaces between the cities, since it is a big map.