T
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hangman! Part III
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
UIs God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment
-
Originally posted by duke o' york
I thought so, but Google said otherwise. I couldn't find Jamski to ask him.
In the singular form it's (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, ablative): vita, vitae, vitae, vitam, vita.
In the plural form it's (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, ablative): vitae, vitarum, vitis, vitas, vitis.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duke o' york
_ _ E _ D
(R A N T)
(VI vitæ)
Don't these lovely dancing chaps liven up the thread no end?
and to supply entertainment... ahh you are the master of the hanging crowd
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zopperoni
You could ask me.
In the singular form it's (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, ablative): vita, vitae, vitae, vitam, vita.
In the plural form it's (nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, ablative): vitae, vitarum, vitis, vitas, vitis.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duke o' york
Zopp, I wasn't looking for lives as in the part of the verb, but as in the plural of life. Vita is life, so Google said vitas was the plural of this, whereas vitæ is lives as in "he lives there", not "a cat has nine lives". Confused? I am.
"He lives" would be "vivit" IIRC.
Comment
Comment