StarCraft!

[vmxa1]

Zero, why do you say Zerg is broken and what do you mean by it? Do you mean they are too strong or too weak?

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Zero
Zerg = broken!!11!!!!!11!!!! w00t w00t!

I call BS.

[Zero]

broken usually means too good.

I say zergs are broken cause theyre my favorite race!!!!!!111!!!
YEAH!!!!11!!!!

Anyway fanboyism aside... okay zergs aren exact broke but Zergs are the best race hands down. Whether you're a BGH player or a ladder player.... (well i can see how zerg arent the best race in BGH cause one of their main strength becomes trivial in BGH games.. )

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Zero

Anyway fanboyism aside... okay zergs aren exact broke but Zergs are the best race hands down. Whether you're a BGH player or a ladder player.... (well i can see how zerg arent the best race in BGH cause one of their main strength becomes trivial in BGH games.. )

Ah, yes BGH. The other reason I don't play StarCraft anymore.


Why the **** do people only play ONE MAP? It's nearly impossible to find a regular game being played on anything but that stupid, ****y, map.


I remember when it was first released, you could even find a decent number of alternate-ruled games like the one where players share control over a single side. But not anymore, it's all just BGH now.

[DinoDoc]

Yesd, I hate infinate money maps too. I especially hate people that play Protoss on them.

[Flip McWho]

Starcraft is a damn good RTS. Best one ever.
Loved the storyline. Don't play online at all so don't know it. Haven't played SC in ages. You guys are making me nostaglic. Damn I wish I had my SC cd now. That woulda been my christmas day.
Oh Merry Christmas everyone it is now 12:45am on christmas day in little old NZ.

[Az]

Starcraft is a damn good RTS. Best one ever.

Nope.

[Skanky Burns]

Well, with a refutation that thorough, who could argue against your view-point?

[MattH]

Originally posted by Azazel

Starcraft is a damn good RTS. Best one ever.

Nope.

Gotta love those one-word replies . If it isn't, what is?

[vmxa1]

It is in my top 5 list, I still found the original C&C and WarcraftII to be my favs in RTS.

[Az]

you have the original C&C, which is better, imho.

[General Ludd]

I'll never get what people find so appealing about C&C. It's so slow and boring. Generals: Zero Hour isthe only one that's even close to being good.

[Az]

slow and boring?

you mean, unlike ZERG RUSH~~!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111 ?

[vmxa1]

Well I think it is hard to appreciate a game this long after it came out. It is hard to measure up, same as old movies. They cannot be judge by todays standards.

When C&C came out it was one of the first RTS games and it was great fun. Would I like it today if I had never played it before, who knows. Some games do stand up.

My friend was 58 when he played his first game and it was Warcraft (last year). He was hooked. I gave him Moo and he loved it. I have given Moo to a number of coworkers over the years (people in thier 20-30's) and they like it.

So as I say who knows. C&C was good enough to get in the hall of fame in most game mags. Was Starcrft better, maybe. But when it came out it did not have the same impact on me. I would say it was a better design and great as well. I would not quarrel with picking either over the other.

You will have to admit Tanya was more fun than an archon.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Azazel
slow and boring?

you mean, unlike ZERG RUSH~~!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111 ?

I mean, sitting around while your ore collectors slowly putt their way way across the map and not even bring you back enough to make a single tank.

Or having so little variety in different units and tactics that every game is pretty much identical to the last.