Who's next?

[August Borms]

Originally posted by Agathon


Not very good communists, associating with the religious folks.

I take it that you mean that people will throw stones at you, because the alternative doesn't seem so bad.

They seemed pretty normal communists... calling themselkves marxist-leninists, and praising Stalin and Mao, but the decades of getting bewteen 0,5and 1% of the voite has made them a bit desperate methinks... and weed is disfgusting!

[August Borms]

But seriously,, I think Sudan needs a regiem change (or splitting up the country)

[MrFun]

We're coming after you, Canada, for all the bannanas you stole from us.

We don't need evidence -- it's in our gut instinct that you have hoarded our bannanas!

[JCG]

Other than North Korea and Iran/Syria, I doubt that the rest of the options are even being considered for direct liberation/intervention...

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Agathon
I only posted it because Donald Rumsfeld has been making noises about Syria. I mean Donald Rumsfeld is always making noises, but they are rarely intelligible.

Sure hope we dont end up with another sand bar, oh..say located 90 miles south of Monroe County Florida..that would be just tooo bad..

Peace

Grandpa Troll

[Wittlich]

My God people! With all of this "Watch out, America is aggressive and will assimilate all counties" threads, one would think that the U.S. has a secret agenda of making Earth into "The United Earth of America"!
....Oops! Maybe I said too much...

[GePap]

Honestly, the prez. and the admin. today could convince a majority of Americans to bak any war aginst a muslim, but specially arab state, in the name of defending us form another 9/11.

Ask people to back a war for regime change outside of the ME though, and it won't happen.

[Kirnwaffen]

If you follow the rather idealistic neocon philosophy/doctrine, Syria is the next logical target. Cuz we all know that an Iran surrounded by democracies will naturally become democratic itself.

[monkspider]

North Korea is possible, but Persia/Syria is far more likely. Bush wouldn't dare fight N. Korea, at least not until he is reelected.

[Kirnwaffen]

Strategically speaking, avoiding Korea is sound policy due to the potential for conflict with China.

[Nevs23]

Some Banana Republic I've forgotten the name of.

There are three reasons for an country to become a target for the US dogs of war.

1. precious and essential mineral resources
2. militarily weak
3. a non US obsequious and enslaved government

[Grandpa Troll]

Originally posted by Nevs23
Some Banana Republic I've forgotten the name of.

There are three reasons for an country to become a target for the US dogs of war.

1. precious and essential mineral resources
2. militarily weak
3. a non US obsequious and enslaved government

1-Terrorist supported regimes
2-Financially supporting Terrorists/and or hiding terrorists
3-Threatening the people of the United States, it is in our doctrine to battle enemies.."both foreign and domestic"
4-Not wiping out countries whom once were problems, had a memory loss as to what they recently went through (as in past 50-100 years) but need a reminder that we, although considered war mongers, are a merciful nation.

Peace

Grandpa Troll

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Nevs23
Some Banana Republic I've forgotten the name of.

There are three reasons for an country to become a target for the US dogs of war.

1. precious and essential mineral resources
2. militarily weak
3. a non US obsequious and enslaved government

[Nevs23]

Originally posted by Troll


1-Terrorist supported regimes
2-Financially supporting Terrorists/and or hiding terrorists

We all know, the US supreme command is in Katar to the coordination of the Iraq war.

The Secretary of the Interior of Katar, Sheikh Abdullah bin Khalid al-Thani, supports the guided tour cadre of the terrorist network Al-Qaida since years.

Is Katar the next target?

[Zero]

Bomb banana republic.

That store is ****ing weird.