Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

On the Venzuelan "Strike"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • On the Venzuelan "Strike"

    Dear Friends,
    For some time, there has been a lot of confusion outside Venezuela about what exactly has been happening there. How could progressives and trade unionists support the Venezuelan government despite its support of the poor through land reform and income redistribution and its attack on neo-liberalism and the FTAA—given the dedicated opposition of the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers (CTV)? How, when there was a general strike, could we side with the government rather than workers? For trade union organisations, the problem has been even more difficult—given the support for the CTV by international labour organisations (including the ILO). Nevertheless, as the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) noted in the statement issued by Ken Georgetti on 18 April last year after the defeated coup, the role of the CTV in that coup against the democratically elected government of Hugo Chavez raised serious questions about the character of the CTV and its place in the crony capitalism and sham democracy that had left 80 % of the population in poverty in an oil-rich nation.

    Today, though, there should be no confusion. Because the CTV has been exposed as just an arm of the Fedecamaras, the Employers Association with which it has been allied-- in the coup and in the so-called general strike. A strange general strike, indeed. One in which workers in the oil industry (blue collar), electricity, transport, public sector, basic industries and the subway, among others, kept working. One in which workers were laid off by the conglomerates (the monopolies) and transnationals and told that they would get full pay for the period of the lock-outs—only now to discover that this promissory note was dependent on the companies defeating the Chavez government. (They are being offered half-pay, loss of vacations, etc... and those that protest? They're in the queues at the Ministry of Labour filing complaints over their dismissals.).

    Make no mistake about it—this so-called general strike was a capitalist offensive, supported by the US and its clients, against the Chavez government. Its immediate effect has been an enormous blow to the economy because of the loss of oil revenues for several months as the result of the sabotage (economic, technical and physical) of PDVSA, the national oil company, and also because of the tax revenue losses resulting from the lockouts and a tax strike by the companies. The resulting 'Opposition Deficit' will make this year a difficult one under any circumstances but particularly so in the attempt to meet the enormous needs of the Venezuelan people.

    Yet, a longer term effect of this offensive by Venezuela's oligarchy has been the increase in the consciousness of the poor (most of them in the informal sector) and organised workers. There is a mood among workers of self-confidence—one which emerged when the workers in PDVSA ran the company by themselves after the management and technicians abandoned it. In workplace after workplace, workers are talking about auto-gestion and co-gestion, about taking over and running their enterprises as cooperatives (as is occurring in the Sheraton Airport Hotel and was the subject of discussion among the workers in the hotel in Caracas where I was staying). PDVSA itself now has two representatives of its workers in its management, and an associated firm in petrochemicals is being run as a cooperative. In particular, the take-over of enterprises by workers is occurring when the owners threaten to shut down—in one case occurring as the workers decided to prevent the removal of machinery. This process is just beginning, but it looks like capital has lost one of its major weapons, its ability to threaten a capital strike—rather than giving in, Venezuelan workers are moving in.

    There is another significant aspect of this new consciousness among workers—which is why there should be no longer any confusion about the CTV and its role in the Venezuelan working class. Yesterday (29 March), a new labour federation was formed—the National Union of Workers (UNT), which has been described as a 'classist, national and revolutionary' union. This new federation has emerged as the result of a long process of discussion which began last July among the Bolivarian Workers Force (FBT), the workers movement fully aligned with the Chavez government and with the Bolivarian movement active among the poor in the Bolivarian Circles, and independent unions (both in and outside the CTV) that are not 'Chavist' but which support the general direction of the government. (This latter group includes in particular the steel workers, subway and petroleum workers.) At the core of these discussions was the question of how autonomous the new federation would be in relation to the government; now, after the last capitalist offensive, the matter has been resolved—UNT ('unity') will be independent, class-oriented, democratic and revolutionary.

    This new federation begins with more workers than have been nominally represented by the CTV, which will lose any credibility it has had outside Venezuela as its member unions leave. (Indeed, the petroleum workers union from which Carlos Ortega, the current head of CTV, came is itself a key union in the formation of UNT.) Of course, capital does not give up so easily. Through the CIA and its various fronts such as the National Endowment for Democracy (which financed the American Center for International Labor Solidarity in its support for the CTV), the opponents of 'the process' in Venezuela will attempt to maintain their hold over the positions of labour federations such as the AFL-CIO, international labour federations like the ICFTU (International Confederation of Free Trade Unions) and the ILO.

    This is why it is especially important now for progressives and trade unionists to inform themselves of what is happening in Venezuela and in the Venezuelan workers movement. [snip]

    No one in Venezuela thinks the struggle is over—not when the stakes are so high. Caracas on 10-14 April offers an opportunity to show solidarity with the most significant movement happening right now in the Americas and to inform yourselves so you can battle effectively against the enemies of this process (who are the enemies of anything similar elsewhere).

    in solidarity,
    mike lebowitz
    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

  • #2
    Sounds like typical commie-speak.
    When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, so?
      Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

      Comment


      • #4
        In other words, screw the workers if they try to undermine an anti-US leader
        "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

        "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

        Comment


        • #5
          any chance of a summary?
          "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

          "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

          Comment


          • #6
            Yeah. Basically the the people on strike were being paid full wages to be there. Now that the opposition's failed in ousting Chavez they don't want to pay out.

            Now they're supposedly pissed off and Chavez has labour on his side.
            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
            Stadtluft Macht Frei
            Killing it is the new killing it
            Ultima Ratio Regum

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Frogger

              Now they're supposedly pissed off and Chavez has labour on his side.


              Hurrah for Chavez.
              Only feebs vote.

              Comment


              • #8
                Of course, not a single little worker was striking against Chavez, it was all a CIA covert operation to protect the remnants of Neoliberalism and crush the Bolivarian Revolution.

                Wake me up when Chavez finally delivers....
                DULCE BELLUM INEXPERTIS

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                  Yeah, so?
                  You'd think with the abysmal history of failure and total non-delivery of the great worker's paradise, they'd at least adopt some new slogans and rhetoric, so as not to give away that their policies are a total dead-end.
                  When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat

                    You'd think with the abysmal history of failure and total non-delivery of the great worker's paradise, they'd at least adopt some new slogans and rhetoric, so as not to give away that their policies are a total dead-end.
                    Yeah, I'd say that about IMF austerity measures.
                    Only feebs vote.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
                      You'd think with the abysmal history of failure and total non-delivery of the great worker's paradise, they'd at least adopt some new slogans and rhetoric, so as not to give away that their policies are a total dead-end.
                      Capitalism has a longer history of failure, yet there are still a lot of people sprouting its supposedly virtues. Same thing.
                      (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                      (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                      (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Urban Ranger

                        Capitalism has a longer history of failure, yet there are still a lot of people sprouting its supposedly virtues. Same thing.
                        Besides, I'd rather live in good old socialist Sweden than hell-hole Detroit. And the women are better looking. (actually I'm not sure about the last one because I'm not sure if it means I have a higher or lower chance of snagging one).
                        Only feebs vote.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Urban Ranger


                          Capitalism has a longer history of failure, yet there are still a lot of people sprouting its supposedly virtues. Same thing.
                          Capitalism at least has some successes to it's credit.
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            He's got us there, boys. Course, capitalism's failures are far more spectacular.
                            Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Capitalism has a longer history of failure, yet there are still a lot of people sprouting its supposedly virtues. Same thing.
                              What failures are these? If you're talking about the abuse of workers during the industrial revolution, then it had nothing to do with capitalism, that happens in any industrialiazation of a nation. Its what made Stalin's atrocities go from simple brutality to all out genocide. Other than that, capitalism has had no large scale failure, and what small failures there have been have been usually rectified on discovery (individual corruption for example).

                              Communism on the other hand has not only had a long history of failure, its set up in such a fashion that it CAN'T succeed. If it did there would be no doctors or scientists, or not good ones anyway. Who's going to go to medical school for most of a decade if their career in medicine is going to land them in the same hovel they'd be in if they took jobs as janitors. Why should 2 jobs, one vastly more complicated and valuable than the other, be making the same pay?

                              People say it looks good on paper, but it doesnt even then. It only looks good when you turn off your brain and succumb to mob mentality. Communism just means everyone is equaly starving.

                              Socialism is only marginally better. Socialism is like taking the bad parts out of capitalism and making them worse. Monopolies are bad, but socialists somehow think they get better when left to the state. Instead of business men, backed only by money, the monoplies are controlled by politicians backed by police and military.

                              The gov't isn't the answer to all your problems, it's only function is to defend you from foreign armies and internal criminals, not to give you "free" medical care and electricity, and i used quotations on free because you do have to pay for it in the form of exorbinant socialist taxes (like 70% income tax).

                              IMO, communists and socialists are people who either want the state to be their mommies, or they really havent looked at the details.
                              Shouldn't you be dead or something?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X