So the big case went before the SC yesterday.
A friend of mine who is now in the Kennedy School at Harvard went to see the proceedings yesterday. He is, not to put too fine a point on it, a legal and political savant, and something of an expert when it comes to AA; he did his thesis on the Bakke case.
His take on what went down--he thinks that Michigan will win the case, 5-4, possibly even 6-3. He went in thinking that UM would probably lose, but after seeing and hearing the Justices question the lawyers, he's pretty sure that UM is going to win this thing.
He said the Justices seemed particularly rough on Solicitor General Ted Olson, who was arguing on behalf of the Bush Administration against UM's admissions policies.
Ruling probably won't be back until June or July... you ought to be able to find transcripts online.
A friend of mine who is now in the Kennedy School at Harvard went to see the proceedings yesterday. He is, not to put too fine a point on it, a legal and political savant, and something of an expert when it comes to AA; he did his thesis on the Bakke case.
His take on what went down--he thinks that Michigan will win the case, 5-4, possibly even 6-3. He went in thinking that UM would probably lose, but after seeing and hearing the Justices question the lawyers, he's pretty sure that UM is going to win this thing.
He said the Justices seemed particularly rough on Solicitor General Ted Olson, who was arguing on behalf of the Bush Administration against UM's admissions policies.
Ruling probably won't be back until June or July... you ought to be able to find transcripts online.
Comment