What most of you don't understand is dealing with a guy trying to surrender is one of the most dangerous and tense situations on the battlefield. You never know if they are for real and to deal with them you have let them get up very close to you or your troops, for searches and so forth.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
POWs
Collapse
X
-
Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
-
What's your point, AH?
I never claimed that soldiers should be omniscient. If they need to make every prisoner strip naked and handcuff themselves before they are allowed to approach, then so be it. And if somebody's approaching you in an Iraqi uniform carrying a rifle then I doubt anybody could say that it's your responsibility to stand up and give him the opportunity to shoot you in order to determine if he's brave or just stupid.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dissident
why won't the U.S. media show the video?
I want to see it. I think it is important for the U.S. to see it. Perhaps the ugly reality of war would sway more americans to be anti-war. Not that I'm anti-war. I just like to be fair to their cause."I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
- BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum
Comment
-
They didn't show it, because the relatives were not informed yet.Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Sparky
Speculate - G.W. Bush stated today, rather succinctly, that anyone treating POW inappropriately will be tried as war criminals. If he is faced with incontrovertible proof that coalition forces inflicted mistreat upon Iraqi POWs, would he send them to The Hague ?Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
"Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter Triggs
No, no. Thats our reaction to all foreigners.
Ambassador: Do... you... speak... English?
Bush: Ha ha. G'joke. Fanee.
Ambassador: Do... you... understand... what... I... am... saying?
Bush: Ack to biznez.
Ambassador: Someone get me a translator.
Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com
Comment
-
ahh here is a POW thread.
CNN just showed interviews with the family. Pure exploitation of the family. Yet I'm watching it for some reason.
And I didn't realize that in Gulf War I there was a female POW. She was sexually assaulted- not too big a suprise.
Comment
-
But now they are actually attacking the BBC as well, well known for not having bias. I wonder what is next
US/UK media is openly cheering. What about that guy that said 'we' are attacking Iraq. Or, upon finding a few gas-masks in an abandoned Iraqi trench, the BBC reporter said that 'it indicates that even Sadams soldiers were expecting him to use Chemical weapons'
And the POW thing. USA prisoners were the big news of the day. They deserved at least as much time on air as that same footage of Iraquis we saw a million times.
CNN is so pro-war and pro-american and in service of propaganda that I wish I knew more languages and wasnt condemned to that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VetLegion
CNN is so pro-war and pro-american and in service of propaganda that I wish I knew more languages and wasnt condemned to that.
Comment
Comment