The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
The fact remains, the people of South Korea, and the people of South VietNam didn't want commie bastards overrunning their land.
So what's the beef?
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Originally posted by SlowwHand
The fact remains, the people of South Korea, and the people of South VietNam didn't want commie bastards overrunning their land.
So what's the beef?
With the South Koreans, that's the case. In South Viet Nam, the people had the choice of corrupt murdering generals, a puppet emperor, or the commies, and it was decided not to bother with elections, because the commies would have embarassed the hell out of western policy by winning.
Elections were only held after the participation of political parties was limited by the non-elected government.
When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
I know it's not your intent, but you strengthen my case, MtG.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
You do realize, that if this stupidity keeps up, They are going to have to recall every video, film, and DVD of Grease and change Frenchies name to Freedom.
ACK!
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!
Originally posted by Lancer
My position is that the US is the only one that doesn't "wipe their ass with international law". Now it seems that the special interests of the French is more important than backing resolutions upon which the French agreed!
The French don't apparently agree that "serious consequences" means "invasion by the United States at a time determined by the United States."
And the US has wiped it's ass with international law so many times it's not even funny. When I worked at Lockheed Missiles & Space Company (now Lockheed-Martin), in one of the departments I supported, there was an old ex-USAF bomber jockey who flew B-36's in the '50's. On his office wall, there was an aerial photo of Red Square in Moscow, viewed from the open bomb bay doors of a B-36, with the silhouette of a nuke visible in the racks, just to let them know we could. That ongoing threat process was why the Russkies accelerated their development of the Mig-15, to the -17, -19 and finally the -21. The SA-2 Gammon SAM system and MiG-25 were developed in response to our overflights of their airspace by U-2's and later SR-71s. You think Gary Francis Powers was shot down over NATO territory, ?
We've committed technical acts of war, piracy, espionage and sabotage during peacetime against dozens of countries. I don't have a real problem with most of that, but it's a bit laughable to say the US is the only country who doesn't wipe our ass with international law. The truth is more that we're the only one who tries to spin international law to claim there's some legitimacy to our actions.
So, unless the French interests are to determine international law, then the US and our allies will act without it. "International law", in the form of the UN, is, imo, corrupted.
Yes, as when the US has used it's veto power in the UNSC to protect Israel? The French were given veto power to use as they see fit.
What's "corrupted?" - the notion that everyone can vote as they see fit and as they believe is consistent with their policy goals, instead of just rubber stamping the US? Why didn't the US call for disarming Hussein when "he gassed his own people?" (despite the DIA conclusion that it was mostly the Iranian gas that did the killing)
Why not? Because that was in 1988, and Saddam was our boy back then.
When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Hey, you've got a case? If it's Jack Daniel's or really good beer, share some.
I gave up the Black Jack.
Beer still flows, if you can grimace Budweiser down, or bring along some Dos Equis.
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Originally posted by Lancer
What if the plane had mechanical trouble? The nuke would fall into the hands of the Russians. The photo must have been futzed with.
The Russians built a bomb in 1949, and a thermonuke in 1953 (?). There were no nuclear secrets between the US and USSR at that point...
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
Comment