by the way, this doesn't mean that NK is somehow better morally than the US. They're just very shrewd, and IMO should be dealt with much care.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rumsfeld wants to move troops out of S. Korea!
Collapse
X
-
You sound bitter, Lancer(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Comment
-
Shrewd? The guy runs a communist economic toilet which is one day going to back up on him really bad.
Comment
-
he can run a crappy country and still outfox the USA in diplomacy. saddam should hire him out"I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
maaaaaaaaaybe. it would be kinda of a **** in the mouth of the US."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Nope, noway. If he goes nuclear, he can kiss his sorry ass good bye. Otherwise, he won't be able to fight the SK. the SK has a strong standing army, a far superior Airforce, and the support of the entire world.
I really don't know what he can do. Although his outmaneuvering of the US was VERY impressive, he's still in dire straights.
If I was him, I'd do anything to get the economy on track. and yes, he can do it. Russia doesn't seem to care about his record at all, so he has at least one major trading partner. Neither will much of the other countries around, even S.K. Then he can support whatever groups or proxies he wishes to fight his enemies.This makes him voulnrable, though, since he becomes dependant on external trade. However he's still safe, since he's got nukes. nothing can take him out, now.
This is as much as I can figure out.
Comment
-
Repositioning troops appears to have more to do with how the US wants more flexability out of these units than with eithier the wishes of DPRK or ROK.
It does also appear that the ROK army would be very effective in stopping the DPRK on their own. Korea is such a small place that any war there would probably destroy much of the ROK economy. For the DPRK to acheive any long term success in dominating the peninsula, it may be that attacking sooner rather than later is in their interests. What better time than when US troops are being repositioned and the bulk of their force is tied down in the ME."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by Azazel
In any case, the presence of 37 thousand US troops will do little to change the way this war is conducted."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
Comment