Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should the world vote on US pres. election?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Urban Ranger
    remove that ridiculous Missile Shield,
    Whatchu talkin'n 'bout Willis? We ain't got no missile shield. We have what proports to be a missile shield. It can't defend us from ****. Only reason it even gets close to the target is because the tests are faked.

    If the damned thing worked, I'd be all for it. I'm pissed because they're deploying it long before it has an practical capabilities.
    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by chegitz guevara
      If the damned thing worked, I'd be all for it
      Why? I would think that you, of all people, would be against things that increased US freedom of action.
      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

      Comment


      • #33
        I don't think that a single world government would be feasible at the current point.

        and a lot of the military spending will remain. The number of people unwilling to submit to the power of the WG will be high, as well as multiple areas around the world where the local authority is non-existant.

        I don't think we have the logistics yet to pull it off, though I wouldn't mind paying less taxes to the national government, and more to the OWG. The amount of things we'll be able to do... global projects, enormous amount of money going on research...

        But that's impossible. we'll have to standartize education, and decide on a single language, and even europe cannot agree on that... pfft.
        urgh.NSFW

        Comment


        • #34
          Should the world vote on US pres. election?
          Sure, only you have to give one person = one vote... and let the US control the entire world. America's elite wouldn't like what would get elected though.
          To us, it is the BEAST.

          Comment


          • #35
            Sounds rather fanboyish to me.
            Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

            Comment


            • #36
              What does?
              To us, it is the BEAST.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Sava
                What does?
                Of a few people around the world dreaming of deciding a presidential election. Why stop there, why not voting in congressional elections, deciding what is taught in schools. It just seems a little like someone was day dreaming about what would be a super cool idea with very few practical thoughts about the subject. Unless they are going to let Americans vote in their elections.
                Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Sava

                  Sure, only you have to give one person = one vote... and let the US control the entire world. America's elite wouldn't like what would get elected though.
                  Well that would be a quick way to a united world but no elitists would like what would get elected as they would all loose... and the chinese would have 1/5 th of all votes... US would just become a region of the new world government - and huh I can bet we would get some Chinese guy elected - or perhaps Indian ...
                  Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                  GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Yeah, but how is that "fanboyish"?
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Sava
                      Yeah, but how is that "fanboyish"?
                      Perhaps arrogent would describe this proposal better. I just get the image of some young american hater sitting in his flat thinking how much better the world would be with american decisions being decided from Europe and other places.
                      Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        First let the American people choose their president 1 person 1 vote ..

                        Actually, I could not support such a thing, I wholeheartedly support the US,Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK joining together, but thats not a political union as such, more of an economic one with close political ties, Id still want a US president, UK/Austalian/New Zealander/Canadian prime ministers .

                        Put it this way, would the US want 60 million French citizens voting in their elections ??? and probably vica versa ???? NOOO

                        If you want to vote for the US president, immigrate !

                        A world government could never work (in our lifetime anyway), the best we can hope for is peaceful alliances, and like minded democracies, and we don't even get that between democracies, so what hope have we of a world Government.. NONE.
                        "Wherever wood floats, you will find the British" . Napoleon

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Every time I think I've seen the goofiest idea possible at ACS, I am corrected.
                          Congrats, carnide.
                          You the man, currently.
                          Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                          "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                          He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by SlowwHand
                            Every time I think I've seen the goofiest idea possible at ACS, I am corrected.
                            Congrats, carnide.
                            You the man, currently.
                            and I can't believe this thread got over 40 posts

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              In due time, Romans had to expand the Roman citizenship.
                              - - -
                              I see no reason why a huge senate/parliament, like the EU parliament (EU has no president) could not have some seats reserved for US and others voters.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X