HO, Vel is right. What the French and German have been saying is give the inspectors more time to find out if Saddam really has WoMD. At the same time, they seem to believe he has at least small pox "weaponized" to the extent that could devastate an unprepared country. Can't you see the inconsistency in this?
As to their opposition to war, it can take three forms:
1) No to war under any circumstances;
2) No to war unless France or Germany are threatened;
3) No to war unless the US is threatened, in which case we will help.
I see the German position as 1. The French also seem to be tending to 1 or 2 as well because the US has said that it believes Saddam is a threat to the US. It is not France's position to disagree with the US on this point. But still it is against war even though their friend and ally is threatened.
As to their opposition to war, it can take three forms:
1) No to war under any circumstances;
2) No to war unless France or Germany are threatened;
3) No to war unless the US is threatened, in which case we will help.
I see the German position as 1. The French also seem to be tending to 1 or 2 as well because the US has said that it believes Saddam is a threat to the US. It is not France's position to disagree with the US on this point. But still it is against war even though their friend and ally is threatened.
Comment