Announcement

**notyoueither** · February 15, 2003, 05:07

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

Are you going to answer my questions, or are you still trying to be evasive?

What question of obfuscation was that? Oh, master (of obfuscation).

**Urban Ranger** · February 15, 2003, 05:17

Originally posted by notyoueither
What question of obfuscation was that? Oh, master (of obfuscation).

Seeing that you are incapable of reading back through this thread, here is a recap of the relevant section:

NYE: And how much have Germany and France spent to defend themselves? How much did they spend to defend themselves?

Tassadar500: [replies with some figures]

NYE: Right Tass, IOW, they are depending on the US to maintain the security of the oil fields. Just as 20 years ago they relied on the US to deter the Red Army from moving West.

[snipped]

UR: Oil fields? Defending the oil fields from whom, may I ask? Will the Iraqis capture the North Sea oil fields?

**David Floyd** · February 15, 2003, 05:17

*Edit: My original response was more harsh then the young Floyd deserved.*

Bring it.

The U.N. didn't have the right to demand Saddam withdraw from Kuwait? On what do you base that opinion?

The UN can posture all it wants to. The bottom line for me is that the US (and Britain, etc.) had no right to send in troops and wage war against a nation which had not attacked the US, and the US had no right to force US citizens to pay billions for this warmongering.

**Alexander's Horse** · February 15, 2003, 05:19

Originally posted by Ted Striker
Hey Eurocoms, do you realize you are being PLAYED by Saddam?

Its got nothing to do with Saddam, its got everything to do with the arrogant warmongering incompetent clumsy oafish redneck diplomacy of the Bush Administration.

They only have themselves to blame.

Big protests in Australia this weekend - up to 200,000 marched in Melbourne yesterday, over 10,000 protested here this morning and we're only a small town.

Attached Files

**Dinner** · February 15, 2003, 05:19

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Homocidal dictator? Oh my side! Is there no end to your silliness? Keep those bald assertions coming, please.

Go ahead and keep denying the obvious UR. Upon my honor it helps your cause... truly it does.. *wink, wink*.

**notyoueither** · February 15, 2003, 05:20

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

Seeing that you are incapable of reading back through this thread, here is a recap of the relevant section:

NYE: And how much have Germany and France spent to defend themselves? How much did they spend to defend themselves?

Tassadar500: [replies with some figures]

NYE: Right Tass, IOW, they are depending on the US to maintain the security of the oil fields. Just as 20 years ago they relied on the US to deter the Red Army from moving West.

[snipped]

UR: Oil fields? Defending the oil fields from whom, may I ask? Will the Iraqis capture the North Sea oil fields?

Right. And then

Geez, Bob. Maybe the guy who attacked two oil producing neighbours?

Duh!

Ludicrous? That would be the willful blindness of the quiet supporters of the homicidal dictator.

To which you asked some blitheringly idiotic question about some European power.

Now, what was your point?

**Urban Ranger** · February 15, 2003, 05:22

Okay.

That means you are not going to answer my question. I will wait until you do, but I will remind you of it later.

**notyoueither** · February 15, 2003, 05:23

Ohhhh, goooody!

**Urban Ranger** · February 15, 2003, 05:24

Originally posted by notyoueither
To which you asked some blitheringly idiotic question about some European power.

That is applicable to you, by asking the defense budget of France and Germany.

**Dinner** · February 15, 2003, 05:25

Originally posted by David Floyd
The UN can posture all it wants to. The bottom line for me is that the US (and Britain, etc.) had no right to send in troops and wage war against a nation which had not attacked the US, and the US had no right to force US citizens to pay billions for this warmongering.

So nation is allowed to take part unless they are directly attack? So if Germany decides to invade Poland then France and Britain have no right to try to prevent it?

**Urban Ranger** · February 15, 2003, 05:26

Originally posted by notyoueither
Ohhhh, goooody!

I don't expect more than a childish response from you, NYE. You have been arguing like a kid.

**David Floyd** · February 15, 2003, 05:26

So nation is allowed to take part unless they are directly attack? So if Germany decides to invade Poland then France and Britain have no right to try to prevent it?

The government of Britain has no right to force its citizens to either fund, fight, or die for Poland. If individuals wish to form "free units", arm and fund and ship themselves overseas to fight, that's fine.

**notyoueither** · February 15, 2003, 05:26

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

That is applicable to you, by asking the defense budget of France and Germany.

ACKK! I am wounded...

**notyoueither** · February 15, 2003, 05:28

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

I don't expect more than a childish response from you, NYE. You have been arguing like a kid.

Are you completely mentally defective?

**Dinner** · February 15, 2003, 05:30

I enjoyed being in the debate club when I was in college. The thing is though that colleges have entrance exams, interviews, and intelligence tests which people must pass before they are admitted. 'Poly doesn't do any of this which means these forums can be much more tedious.

Announcement

Massive World Protests Tomorrow

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment