Originally posted by Dissident
This would involve forcibly moving U.S. troops to African nations to distribute food. They may not like this. The U.N. would not like us moving U.S. troops into other nations.
This would involve forcibly moving U.S. troops to African nations to distribute food. They may not like this. The U.N. would not like us moving U.S. troops into other nations.
"Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime."
In fact, just removing the huge subsidies that both US and the EU give to their farmers would go a long way to alleviating world hunger. The developing nations would actually have an export that makes them money, instead of having to rely on the IMF and handouts from more prosperous nations.
Now there's a waste of money, paying people not to grow things.
Comment