Announcement

**Lancer** · January 27, 2003, 08:17

Well it's an interesting situation certainly. I'd guess everyone will blame the US no matter what happens. We'll find out soon enough.

**Usually Insane** · January 27, 2003, 08:40

well, you'll see when the bombs start raining they will want to go home to mom. except the children I suppose, they just want to go away

**Aro** · January 27, 2003, 09:41

Originally posted by Lancer
Well it's an interesting situation certainly. I'd guess everyone will blame the US no matter what happens. We'll find out soon enough.

That’s the point.. Everyone will blame USA. Unfair, but a common mistake; the world will mix together the people from USA and the USA government, and they aren't the same thing.

I don't think war is the best solution... but, it is a solution. Robert Heinlein used to say something like this: Wars have solved more "troubles" in the humankind history than any other method... not nice, but true, very true. Human shields can't face that.

Oil (energy) is the only thing that counts in the universe. We're talking about that, aren't we?
(Bush isn't in my nightmares... Condoleezza Rice and **** Channey are.

)

I don't know if this makes any sense to you, guys. My bad English doesn't help, too...

.

Just to make myself clear, I don't participate in mob riots against USA. Saddham is a insane dictator (he's smart, and this makes him more dangerous...), no doubts about that. But Bush isn't exactly a kind person...

(he's not so smart... and this makes him more dangerous!)

Just my two "centavos".

Originally posted by Aro

... Condoleezza Rice and **** Channey...

This is weird. We're not talking about Clinton...

**OneFootInTheGrave** · January 27, 2003, 10:26

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Hard to blow up a bunch of grannies, idealistic youths and sweet old church pastors, which seems to be the people going.....

How hard is it to miss them when they are already there? What could be interesting that Iraqis make sure they are with Saddam all the time

Saddam together with 100 protestors, now would the US drop the bombs on his house

Attached Files

**Dinner** · January 27, 2003, 10:53

From a human life and national security stand point the best thing to do is attack the targets any way. Do that will demenstrate to leftest morons that this tactic doesn't work and they will give it up. This means fewer of these poor deluded souls will end up dieing in the long run.

**DinoDoc** · January 27, 2003, 11:05

We should issue them all GPS transmitters so that we will know which of Iraq's critical fascilities are being shieled by the Westerners otherwise thier actions will be meaningless.

**Dinner** · January 27, 2003, 11:11

As an added bonus our missiles could track the GPS signals and we could get rid of two pains in one stroke.

**My Wife Hates CIV** · January 27, 2003, 13:21

They'll make great first targets. If enough crazy people go it will be good for the US numbers. If enough people are blown up, than the number of killed compared to just the number of friendly fire deaths will look better on paper. Hey! now there's a job for the French. God, i hate the french so bad. Worthless resource using excuses for humans. I'm sure they would screw up the whole human shield thing also.

**SlowwHand** · January 27, 2003, 14:07

Of course. When in the history of mankind, have the French not screwed up?

**Lord Merciless** · January 27, 2003, 16:12

I don't think Iraqis would trust these people anyway, they could be CIA operatives after all.

**Chris 62** · January 27, 2003, 16:26

Didn't like the other thread about this horsie?

To repeat:

We should give them shirts with bull's eyes on them.

No, it won't make an iota of difference, and I would rather these yahoos get craoked them any Iraqi civillians.

**DinoDoc** · January 27, 2003, 16:29

Originally posted by Lord Merciless
I don't think Iraqis would trust these people anyway, they could be CIA operatives after all.

You mean we might actually have given them all GPS transmitters!?!?

**Caligastia** · January 27, 2003, 16:30

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Things could get very messy for the US led alliance if thousands go to Iraq to act as human shields.

Anti-war human shields attempt to prevent attack

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,880349,00.html

First wave of volunteers prepare to set off for Baghdad.

This is an extraordinary phenomenon - some Australians have gone, Americans and Canadians as well.

The aim is to get thousands over there and thwart the military campaign.

Talk about killing two birds with one stone.

**Sheik** · January 27, 2003, 17:34

The US will issue evacuation warnings similar to those already issued and will urge other governments to do the same. The policy will be that you can leave or stay but the army isn't stopping.

**Jon Miller** · January 27, 2003, 17:45

I think that next year there will be a lot more people up for the darwin awards

I mean does this sound like good thinking to you?

There is a AA site right there and a huge military force is attacking and destroying such places withe bombs. Well, I think I will walk over and stand right on top of it than.

To me this sounds like a Darwin award nominee. I mean if you are Anti-War, there are much saner ways to go about it.

Jon Miller

Announcement

Volunteer Human Shields going to Iraq

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment