Originally posted by GP
Come on Kitty. We're not going to only elect Democrats cause you all liked Clinton and Carter better than Reagan and Bush. The countries have their differences. Deal with it. You all haven't followed us everywhere anyway. No Vietnam involvement, etc.
If you are kvetching about the trade stuff (lumber, etc.) you've got my sympathy. I think we need a firmer free-trade agreement. But you know how trade politics are...
Come on Kitty. We're not going to only elect Democrats cause you all liked Clinton and Carter better than Reagan and Bush. The countries have their differences. Deal with it. You all haven't followed us everywhere anyway. No Vietnam involvement, etc.
If you are kvetching about the trade stuff (lumber, etc.) you've got my sympathy. I think we need a firmer free-trade agreement. But you know how trade politics are...
I'm referring both to his interesting take on world affairs and his 19th century view of tarriff policies, by the way. Both of which were becoming evident before terrorist attacks. He seemed more comfortable dealing with 3rd world despots than with leaders of industrialised countries. Perception is that he can't stand dealing with anybody who'll ask him to compromise.
Comment