Imran and Shi. I agree. The cat issue is a non-starter. There is much to be learned from the dissection of cats. (I suggest we start with Tuberski )
However, Frist's failure to vote until he was 36 and the conflict of interest arising from his $25 million investment in HCA gives me pause.
If he were a member of the White House, its conflict-of-interest rules would force Frist to divest. If he were a member of the House, its conflict-of-interest rules would permit him to keep the investment, but he wouldn't be able to vote on any health-care issues. But under Senate rules, Frist can keep the investment and vote on health-care issues...as long as his vote is "for the good of the country."
However, Frist's failure to vote until he was 36 and the conflict of interest arising from his $25 million investment in HCA gives me pause.
If he were a member of the White House, its conflict-of-interest rules would force Frist to divest. If he were a member of the House, its conflict-of-interest rules would permit him to keep the investment, but he wouldn't be able to vote on any health-care issues. But under Senate rules, Frist can keep the investment and vote on health-care issues...as long as his vote is "for the good of the country."
Comment