The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Battle for the US senate. Repeat of 2000 fiasco? NJ SC to intervene.
Is there anyone here who actually believes that if the situation were reversed the GOP wouldn't be trying to slime their way past the rule?
Point 1: The court should deny the Dem request.
Point 2: The Republicans are every bit as opportunistic, if not outright criminal, in their pursuit of power, as their utter contempt for the voting process in '02 showed once again.
It is much easier to be critical than to be correct. Benjamin Disraeli
Originally posted by Kepler
Point 2: The Republicans are every bit as opportunistic, if not outright criminal, in their pursuit of power, as their utter contempt for the voting process in '02 showed once again.
I bet you'd like to elaborate on this, which would please me as well. Perhaps I would then understand what you are talking about.
He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Originally posted by Roland
I couldn't stand it on serious matters. Guess she's not working in criminal law ?
She volunteers for legal aid. It varies, but it's all "small" civil stuff. She works full time as a pharmacist (her original career), and it pays so much better, she can't afford to quit.
He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Perhaps, if the Republican had resigned, but that's beside the point. The Dems want a court fight, because they think they can make the voters think that the Republicans are trying to rob them of their vote by not allowing a replacement candidate, and cause a backlash that will carry the seat. This poll suggests that such a backlash will not happen.
No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
I think the Dems do have an argument. Is it reasonable to deny voters a choice based on a law stating 51 vs 36 days? What about another number of days? IMO it depends on why the law states that number, whether its arbitrary or whether other voters will be disenfranchised with less than 51 days (someone mentioned the military ballots).
You have no objection to the military being excluded from the voting process? The ballots have already been mailed and it is my understanding that some people have already voted. The Democrats are destroying themselves here.
Comment